Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Minnesota

The Gardens at Foley Assisted Living

Foley, MN · ~20 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Gardens at Foley Assisted Living runs at 61% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade B.

The Gardens at Foley Assisted Living: 2.3 TCR = 61% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Gardens at Foley Assisted Living safety composite

The Gardens at Foley Assisted Living scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 2.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

The Gardens at Foley Assisted Living held a steady TCR band

The Gardens at Foley Assisted Living's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 6.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=0.0 · 2021=6.9 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Foley, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.3 · 61% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #20/226
  • PHOTO Brookdale East Niska…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brookdale East Niskayuna (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

The Gardens at Foley Assisted Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Gardens at Foley Assisted Living averages 2.3 TCR (61% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Gardens at Foley Assisted Living TCR series: 2019=0 · 2021=6.9 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.8

Where The Gardens at Foley Assisted Living falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #20 safest of 226 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Minnesota.

The Gardens at Foley Assisted Living (20 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate The Gardens at Foley Assisted Living
The Gardens at Foley Assisted Living (20 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

The Gardens at Foley Assisted Living has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 6.9 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · MN · Foley

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 17 employers in Foley, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brookdale East Niskayuna 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rocky River 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pioneer Ridge 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Senior Citizens Home, Inc. 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE C74 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE MNSGA-SEL-SELECT GENETICS ADMIN' 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bees Minnesota 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Glyndon 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kent Precision Foods Group- Foley 172 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Gardens at Foley 123 FTE
CITY-NEAR Benton County - Human Services 108 FTE
CITY-NEAR High School 96 FTE
NAT-TCR Sound Catering, Inc. 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR American Coach Leasing Corp. 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Northeast Billerica Plant and Branch 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR FP- Hopkinsville 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hampton Inn & Suites Chicago (Matteson) 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Courtyard North Little Rock 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE PF Yukon ALF Ops, LLC 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hampton Inn Knoxville East 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.