Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Florida

The Gardens of Port St. Lucie

Port St. Lucie, FL · ~96 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Gardens of Port St. Lucie runs at 325% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

The Gardens of Port St. Lucie: 12.4 TCR = 325% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Gardens of Port St. Lucie safety composite

The Gardens of Port St. Lucie scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Gardens of Port St. Lucie: 4.4 → 6.5 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 37.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.35× in 2024

The Gardens of Port St. Lucie's TCR rose 2.1 from 4.4 in 2018 to 6.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 37.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.35× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Port St. Lucie, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.4 · 325% of ind

  • DART 4.3 DART
  • RANK #327/396
  • PHOTO Azura Sheboygan
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~96 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Azura Sheboygan (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

The Gardens of Port St. Lucie in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Gardens of Port St. Lucie averages 12.4 TCR (325% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Gardens of Port St. Lucie TCR series: 2018=4.4 · 2019=7.3 · 2020=16.2 · 2021=37.2 · 2022=2.5 · 2024=6.5 · BLS 3.8

Where The Gardens of Port St. Lucie falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #327 safest of 396 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Florida.

The Gardens of Port St. Lucie (96 employees, TCR 12.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Gardens of Port St. Lucie
The Gardens of Port St. Lucie (96 employees, TCR 12.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

The Gardens of Port St. Lucie has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.5 4.3 3 0 0
2022 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2021 37.2 37.2 0 21 0
2020 16.2 16.2 6 8 0
2019 7.3 7.3 6 1 0
2018 4.4 2.2 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · FL · Port St. Lucie

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 45 employers in Port St. Lucie, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Azura Sheboygan 12.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR POET'S WALK LEESBURG 12.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Park of Vintage Hills 12.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Evergreen Heights 12.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sauer Incorporated 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE JGR Construction, Inc 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE McLeod Land & Equipment, Inc. 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE BU 3462 - FDOT-I-275 Sect 7_PH 1-Tampa 96 FTE
CITY-NEAR 890 894 Building 2 Thrift Shop (TCH10) 1,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gerelco Electrical Contractors, Inc. 286 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tamco 243 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6458-PTRS 241 FTE
NAT-TCR Nissen Vineyard Services Inc. 12.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 218 Addison St. 12.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Cetro Corporation dba Best Western 12.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Grijalva Contractors 12.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Gibbs Construction LLC 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store 469 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE Barron 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kansas City Mo - 229 96 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.