Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Park of Vintage Hills

Temecula, CA · ~112 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Park of Vintage Hills runs at 325% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Park of Vintage Hills: 12.4 TCR = 325% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Park of Vintage Hills safety composite

Park of Vintage Hills scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Park of Vintage Hills: 10.3 → 13.5 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 15.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.4× in 2022

Park of Vintage Hills's TCR rose 3.2 from 10.3 in 2017 to 13.5 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 15.2 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Temecula, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 12.4 · 325% of ind

  • DART 4.9 DART
  • RANK #444/635
  • PHOTO Azura Sheboygan
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 40 inj
  • SIZE ~112 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Azura Sheboygan (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Park of Vintage Hills in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Park of Vintage Hills averages 12.4 TCR (325% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Park of Vintage Hills TCR series: 2017=10.3 · 2019=10.7 · 2020=12.1 · 2021=15.2 · 2022=13.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Park of Vintage Hills falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #444 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Park of Vintage Hills (112 employees, TCR 12.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Park of Vintage Hills
Park of Vintage Hills (112 employees, TCR 12.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Park of Vintage Hills has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 13.5 4.9 11 0 0
2021 15.2 8.9 8 4 0
2020 12.1 10.9 5 5 0
2019 10.7 8.0 8 0 0
2017 10.3 7.7 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Temecula

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 164 employers in Temecula, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Azura Sheboygan 12.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR POET'S WALK LEESBURG 12.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Gardens of Port St. Lucie 12.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Evergreen Heights 12.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE DFF 112 FTE
STATE-SIZE HMB North Property 112 FTE
STATE-SIZE PULIDO AG SERVICE 112 FTE
STATE-SIZE Central City Harvesting, Inc. 112 FTE
CITY-NEAR AV Temecula Campus 1,638 FTE
CITY-NEAR AV-Temecula Campus 1,493 FTE
CITY-NEAR 289 TEMECULA VALLEY HOSPITAL, INC.-TEMECULA VALLEY HOSPITAL 1,200 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2576-289 726 FTE
NAT-TCR Newmark Development 12.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 168358-West Frankfort Po 12.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 567720-South Milwaukee Po 12.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 4054-ABS-0027-0026-00458 12.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE DanChem Technologies, Inc 112 FTE
NAT-SIZE USM Store #527 112 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kew Gardens 112 FTE
NAT-SIZE Liberty Nursing Center of Mansfield 112 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.