Gear cutting and finishing machines, metalworking, manufacturing · New York

The Gleason Works

Rochester, NY · ~609 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Gleason Works runs at 61% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Gear cutting and finishing machines, metalworking, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

The Gleason Works: 2.0 TCR = 61% of Gear cutting and finishing machines, metalworking, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Gleason Works safety composite

The Gleason Works scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Gleason Works: 1.7 → 2.1 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 4.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.77× in 2024

The Gleason Works's TCR rose 0.4 from 1.7 in 2016 to 2.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 4.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.77× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333517 · Rochester, NY AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 61% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #2/16
  • PHOTO The Lincoln Electric…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 111 inj
  • SIZE ~609 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Lincoln Electric Company - Reno (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

The Gleason Works in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Gleason Works averages 2.0 TCR (61% of the Gear cutting and finishing machines, metalworking, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Gleason Works TCR series: 2016=1.7 · 2017=1.9 · 2018=2.3 · 2019=4.3 · 2020=0.8 · 2021=2.5 · 2022=1.4 · 2023=1 · 2024=2.1 · BLS 3.3

Where The Gleason Works falls in its industry

391 Gear cutting and finishing mac establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 16 Gear cutting and finishing mac employers in New York.

The Gleason Works (609 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate The Gleason Works
The Gleason Works (609 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 3.4

The Gleason Works has more employees than the Gear cutting and finishing machines, met median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.1 1.5 11 0 0
2023 1.0 0.6 5 0 0
2022 1.4 0.8 7 0 0
2021 2.5 1.3 12 0 0
2020 0.8 0.6 4 0 0
2019 4.3 3.4 28 2 0
2018 2.3 0.9 17 0 0
2017 1.9 1.3 14 0 0
2016 1.7 1.3 13 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333517 · NY · Rochester

391 Gear cutting and finishing machines, metalworking, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 956 employers in Rochester, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Lincoln Electric Company - Reno 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Weiss-Aug East Hanover 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR KPM Herkules USA 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ferguson Perforating Co. 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Perinton 609 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ortho Clinical Diagnostics - Building 313 610 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pittsford 608 FTE
STATE-SIZE Building Service 32BJ Benefit Funds 610 FTE
CITY-NEAR Division 50 University of Rochester 13,244 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rochester General Hospital 7,833 FTE
CITY-NEAR Division 40 University of Rochester 4,884 FTE
CITY-NEAR Unity Hospital 3,158 FTE
NAT-TCR Mcincr - Mcb Quantico 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Bechtold Enterprises INC 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR H & M Industrial Services, Inc. 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Robertsville Middle School 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - MDT2 609 FTE
NAT-SIZE Michels Pipeline Inc-WI-Brownsville 609 FTE
NAT-SIZE Corporate Admin - 1001 609 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sterilite Corporation CSC 609 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.