Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Georgia

The Glen at Lake Oconee Village

Greensboro, GA · ~60 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Glen at Lake Oconee Village runs at 221% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

The Glen at Lake Oconee Village: 8.4 TCR = 221% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Glen at Lake Oconee Village safety composite

The Glen at Lake Oconee Village scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Glen at Lake Oconee Village: 0.0 → 6.6 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 17.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.39× in 2024

The Glen at Lake Oconee Village's TCR rose 6.6 from 0.0 in 2016 to 6.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 17.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Greensboro, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.4 · 221% of ind

  • DART 3.3 DART
  • RANK #114/205
  • PHOTO Nebraska P.E.O. Home
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~60 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Nebraska P.E.O. Home (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

The Glen at Lake Oconee Village in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Glen at Lake Oconee Village averages 8.4 TCR (221% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Glen at Lake Oconee Village TCR series: 2016=0 · 2020=17.6 · 2021=14.1 · 2022=5.7 · 2023=6.3 · 2024=6.6 · BLS 3.8

Where The Glen at Lake Oconee Village falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #114 safest of 205 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Georgia.

The Glen at Lake Oconee Village (60 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Glen at Lake Oconee Village
The Glen at Lake Oconee Village (60 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

The Glen at Lake Oconee Village has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.6 3.3 4 0 0
2023 6.3 1.6 3 1 0
2022 5.7 5.7 3 0 0
2021 14.1 8.1 6 1 0
2020 17.6 12.3 5 5 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · GA · Greensboro

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 22 employers in Greensboro, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Nebraska P.E.O. Home 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale MacArthur Park 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sunapee Cove Assisted Living 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cedar Ridge Alz 8.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dalton Hatchery 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Fulton Operating - 116675 Wills Road 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gainesville District - Jackson EMC 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Prestwick Companies 60 FTE
CITY-NEAR Daniel RP Management, LLC 750 FTE
CITY-NEAR Good Samaritan Hospital-SMHCS-GA 226 FTE
CITY-NEAR NIBCO Greensboro 217 FTE
CITY-NEAR Good Samaritan 215 FTE
NAT-TCR Evolve 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 10465 Midtown Detroit 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Americold Logistics, LLC: Fairmont 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Medical West 8.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE CITE Armored Batesville 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE New Haven Little River 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Runner Express Logistics 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sun Pacific Farming Cooperative, Inc | Grapes Delano 60 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.