Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · South Carolina

New Haven Little River

Little River, SC · ~60 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

New Haven Little River runs at 191% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

New Haven Little River: 7.3 TCR = 191% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

New Haven Little River safety composite

New Haven Little River scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.8

2021→2024

New Haven Little River injury rate improved

New Haven Little River's TCR fell 5.8 from 12.6 in 2021 to 6.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 12.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.62× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=12.6 · 2022=2.0 · 2023=7.6 · 2024=6.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Little River, SC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 7.3 · 191% of ind

  • DART 4.5 DART
  • RANK #50/107
  • PHOTO Dellwood Gardens
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~60 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Dellwood Gardens (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

New Haven Little River in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows New Haven Little River averages 7.3 TCR (191% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

New Haven Little River TCR series: 2021=12.6 · 2022=2 · 2023=7.6 · 2024=6.8 · BLS 3.8

Where New Haven Little River falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #50 safest of 107 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in South Carolina.

New Haven Little River (60 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate New Haven Little River
New Haven Little River (60 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

New Haven Little River has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.8 4.5 3 0 0
2023 7.6 3.8 4 0 0
2022 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2021 12.6 7.6 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · SC · Little River

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 19 employers in Little River, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Dellwood Gardens 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR OBX-HHH1-SPRING ARBOR OUTER BANKS 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Eden Prairie 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heritage-6, LLC 7.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Main office 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Charleston LEC, Inc. 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Poseidon Advanced Materials 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE United Forest Products Inc. 60 FTE
CITY-NEAR MCLEOD-SEACOAST MEDICAL CTR 1,036 FTE
CITY-NEAR McLeod Health Seacoast 779 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tidelands Health Rehabilitation Hospital at Little River 214 FTE
CITY-NEAR A.O. Hardee and Son, Inc. 179 FTE
NAT-TCR SPAR Marketing Force, Inc 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR MADO Healthcare Old Town 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Monin, Inc. Zelienople 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Holland Michigan Mi - 3520 7.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE CITE Armored Batesville 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Black Nile Logistics LLC 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Glen at Lake Oconee Village 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Training HAUS 60 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.