Continuing care retirement communities · Louisiana

The Glen System Administration office

Shreveport, LA · ~53 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Glen System Administration office runs at 63% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade B.

The Glen System Administration office: 2.4 TCR = 63% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Glen System Administration office safety composite

The Glen System Administration office scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 2.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

The Glen System Administration office held a steady TCR band

The Glen System Administration office's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 5.5 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=3.6 · 2019=3.8 · 2020=5.5 · 2021=3.8 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Shreveport, LA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 63% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/36
  • PHOTO AMELIA PLACE
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~53 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: AMELIA PLACE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Louisiana employers → · Look up another →

The Glen System Administration office in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Glen System Administration office averages 2.4 TCR (63% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Glen System Administration office TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=3.6 · 2019=3.8 · 2020=5.5 · 2021=3.8 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.8

Where The Glen System Administration office falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Louisiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 36 Continuing care retirement com employers in Louisiana.

The Glen System Administration office (53 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate The Glen System Administration office
The Glen System Administration office (53 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

The Glen System Administration office has fewer employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 3.8 3.8 2 0 0
2020 5.5 3.6 3 0 0
2019 3.8 3.8 2 0 0
2018 3.6 1.8 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · LA · Shreveport

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 6,723 rated employers in Louisiana with headcount on file · 403 employers in Shreveport, LA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR AMELIA PLACE 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Focused Care at Gilmer 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Liberty Court 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Regency Senior Communities New Berlin 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Shreveport 2444 Levy AK3K 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE DonahueFavret Contractors, Inc. 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE US Aqua Services Inc 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE WT Construction Inc. 53 FTE
CITY-NEAR Willis-Knighton Medical Center 3,163 FTE
CITY-NEAR UNIVERSITY HEALTH SHEREVPORT, LLC d/b/a OCHSNER LSU HEALTH SHREVEPORT 2,771 FTE
CITY-NEAR University Health Shreveport 2,424 FTE
CITY-NEAR Willis-Knighton Pierremont Health Center 1,567 FTE
NAT-TCR Gavilon Grain - Amarillo 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR CWI-Clinical/Health Services 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Town & Country Hardware 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Agri Supply of Florence 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hedgewood Assisted Living 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cramer's Cashway Inc. 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE HG506 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE HG814 53 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.