Homes for the elderly with nursing care · New York

The Grand Rehabilitation and Nursing at Utica

Utica, NY · ~361 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
17.4
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Grand Rehabilitation and Nursing at Utica runs at 268% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Homes for the elderly with nursing care workplace, earning a grade F.

The Grand Rehabilitation and Nursing at Utica: 17.4 TCR = 268% of Homes for the elderly with nursing care BLS 6.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Grand Rehabilitation and Nursing at Utica safety composite

The Grand Rehabilitation and Nursing at Utica scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 35% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 17.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
D 5.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−36.3

2021→2024

The Grand Rehabilitation and Nursing at Utica injury rate improved

The Grand Rehabilitation and Nursing at Utica's TCR fell 36.3 from 42.0 in 2021 to 5.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 73.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.3× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=42.0 · 2022=73.4 · 2023=4.6 · 2024=5.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Utica, NY ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 17.4 · 268% of ind

  • DART 5.2 DART
  • RANK #564/616
  • PHOTO Saxony Court Senior …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 39 inj
  • SIZE ~361 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Saxony Court Senior Living (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

The Grand Rehabilitation and Nursing at Utica in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Grand Rehabilitation and Nursing at Utica averages 17.4 TCR (268% of the Homes for the elderly with nursing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Grand Rehabilitation and Nursing at Utica TCR series: 2021=42 · 2022=73.4 · 2023=4.6 · 2024=5.7 · BLS 6.5

Where The Grand Rehabilitation and Nursing at Utica falls in its industry

15,252 Homes for the elderly with nur establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #564 safest of 616 Homes for the elderly with nur employers in New York.

The Grand Rehabilitation and Nursing at Utica (361 employees, TCR 17.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate The Grand Rehabilitation and Nursing at Utica
The Grand Rehabilitation and Nursing at Utica (361 employees, TCR 17.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

The Grand Rehabilitation and Nursing at Utica has more employees than the Homes for the elderly with nursing care median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.7 5.2 11 0 0
2023 4.6 4.6 9 0 0
2022 73.4 73.4 12 148 0
2021 42.0 41.5 7 77 1

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · NY · Utica

15,252 Homes for the elderly with nursing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 148 employers in Utica, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Saxony Court Senior Living 17.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR CareCore at Margaret Hall 17.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Welcome Nursing Home 17.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 259365 17.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE 3420 361 FTE
STATE-SIZE NYYON - YONKERS 361 FTE
STATE-SIZE NY_New York City_120 E. 23rd St._0AMA1580 361 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tonawanda 361 FTE
CITY-NEAR Resource Center for Independent Living 3,351 FTE
CITY-NEAR Faxton St. Lukes 1,727 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Elizabeth Medical Center 1,324 FTE
CITY-NEAR Utica University 915 FTE
NAT-TCR Lakefield Veterinary Group - 147 17.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Castro 17.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Mid-West Spring & Stamping 17.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 6957-MRY 17.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Acuity Specialty Hospital - Ohio Valley, L.P. (d/b/a/ Select Specialty Hospital - Weirton) 361 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ceres Baltimore 361 FTE
NAT-SIZE Foodservice Shawano - 0564 361 FTE
NAT-SIZE BSWQA Care Management 361 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.