Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Alabama

The Harbor at Hickory Hill

Prattville, AL · ~41 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Harbor at Hickory Hill runs at 110% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

The Harbor at Hickory Hill: 4.2 TCR = 110% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Harbor at Hickory Hill safety composite

The Harbor at Hickory Hill scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 4.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

The Harbor at Hickory Hill held a steady TCR band

The Harbor at Hickory Hill's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 19.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=19.4 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=14.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Prattville, AL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.2 · 110% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #22/64
  • PHOTO The Harbor at Opelika
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Harbor at Opelika (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

The Harbor at Hickory Hill in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Harbor at Hickory Hill averages 4.2 TCR (110% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Harbor at Hickory Hill TCR series: 2016=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=19.4 · 2022=0 · 2023=14 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where The Harbor at Hickory Hill falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 75% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #22 safest of 64 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Alabama.

The Harbor at Hickory Hill (41 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Harbor at Hickory Hill
The Harbor at Hickory Hill (41 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

The Harbor at Hickory Hill has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 14.0 0.0 5 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 19.4 19.4 6 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · AL · Prattville

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 50 employers in Prattville, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Harbor at Opelika 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Truewood by Merrill First Hill 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR PF LW ALF Ops, LLC 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Paramount Senior Living at Westerville 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Eufaula Hatchery 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE JCG Farms of Georgia 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jasper Office - APC 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE S. A. Graham Company, Inc. 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR IP Prattville Mill 658 FTE
CITY-NEAR International Paper 620 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prattville Baptist Hospital 396 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 483 361 FTE
NAT-TCR Brookdale Summerfield 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Wichita Presbyterian Manor 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 102430-Okc-Main Store 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Lawrence Construction Company 4.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Piketon Nursing Center 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Industrial Automation LLC 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Buttonwillow Land & Cattle Company 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trumbull Industries Inc Branch 1 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.