Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Alabama

The Harbor at Opelika

Opelika, AL · ~33 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Harbor at Opelika runs at 110% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

The Harbor at Opelika: 4.2 TCR = 110% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Harbor at Opelika safety composite

The Harbor at Opelika scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 44%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 4.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Harbor at Opelika: 0.4 → 8.1 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 8.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.97× in 2024

The Harbor at Opelika's TCR rose 7.7 from 0.4 in 2018 to 8.1 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.97× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Opelika, AL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.2 · 110% of ind

  • DART 4.0 DART
  • RANK #21/64
  • PHOTO Truewood by Merrill …
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Truewood by Merrill First Hill (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

The Harbor at Opelika in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Harbor at Opelika averages 4.2 TCR (110% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Harbor at Opelika TCR series: 2018=0.4 · 2019=0 · 2020=8 · 2022=3.4 · 2023=5.1 · 2024=8.1 · BLS 3.8

Where The Harbor at Opelika falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 75% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 64 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Alabama.

The Harbor at Opelika (33 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Harbor at Opelika
The Harbor at Opelika (33 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

The Harbor at Opelika has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.1 4.0 1 1 0
2023 5.1 0.0 2 0 0
2022 3.4 0.0 1 0 0
2020 8.0 0.0 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.4 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · AL · Opelika

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 87 employers in Opelika, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Truewood by Merrill First Hill 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Harbor at Hickory Hill 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR PF LW ALF Ops, LLC 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Paramount Senior Living at Westerville 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fulton Logging Company 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sowega Cotton Hartford 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harris 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southeast Division Phenix City Office 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6095 849 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 6095 843 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mando America Corporation 493 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hanwha Advanced Materials America LLC. Opelika 470 FTE
NAT-TCR 493008-Exeter | RI | OST-140 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Franz Bakery Springfield Division - Eureka Depot and Outlet 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR World Wood 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Bellingham 4.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wetz Warehousing LLC 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bushnell Truss Enterprises LLC 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Growmark Fs, LLC - East Berlin 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Equix Energy Services, LLC - Corpus Christi 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.