Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Minnesota

The Harbor at Peace Village

Norwood Young America, MN · ~29 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Harbor at Peace Village runs at 128% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

The Harbor at Peace Village: 4.9 TCR = 128% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Harbor at Peace Village safety composite

The Harbor at Peace Village scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.4

2017→2022

The Harbor at Peace Village injury rate improved

The Harbor at Peace Village's TCR fell 7.4 from 7.4 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 7.7 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=7.4 · 2018=4.4 · 2019=7.7 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Norwood Young America, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.9 · 128% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #63/226
  • PHOTO Oak Hill Supportive …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Oak Hill Supportive Living (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

The Harbor at Peace Village in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Harbor at Peace Village averages 4.9 TCR (128% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Harbor at Peace Village TCR series: 2017=7.4 · 2018=4.4 · 2019=7.7 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.8

Where The Harbor at Peace Village falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 70% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #63 safest of 226 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Minnesota.

The Harbor at Peace Village (29 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate The Harbor at Peace Village
The Harbor at Peace Village (29 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

The Harbor at Peace Village has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 7.7 7.7 1 0 0
2018 4.4 4.4 1 0 0
2017 7.4 7.4 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · MN · Norwood Young America

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 4 employers in Norwood Young America, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Oak Hill Supportive Living 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR St Camillus Health System Inc 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Marycrest Assisted Living 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Gables on Pelham 4.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Northern Plains Dairy LLP 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE The tru Shrimp Company 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2530-Redwood Falls, MN-FND (Monsanto Co.) 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kasota Stone Fabricators 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bongards' Creameries 223 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Haven at Peace Village 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hydro Engineering 23 FTE
NAT-TCR Gavilon Grain - Joice 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Heartland Greencastle 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Taylor Tele-Communications, Inc. 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR SuperMax Trujillo Alto 4.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Amsberry's Painting, Inc 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ottumwa Branch 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Best Line Equipment - Mechanicsburg 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bronco Electric, Inc. 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.