Community recreation programs, government · Michigan

The Hawk - Farmington Hills Community Center

Farmington Hills, MI · ~440 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Hawk - Farmington Hills Community Center runs at 25% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Community recreation programs, government workplace, earning a grade A.

The Hawk - Farmington Hills Community Center: 0.8 TCR = 25% of Community recreation programs, government BLS 3.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Hawk - Farmington Hills Community Center safety composite

The Hawk - Farmington Hills Community Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Hawk - Farmington Hills Community Center: 0.0 → 1.6 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 1.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1× in 2023

The Hawk - Farmington Hills Community Center's TCR rose 1.6 from 0.0 in 2022 to 1.6 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 924120 · Farmington Hills, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 25% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #3/26
  • PHOTO CONSTITUTION HALL - …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~440 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CONSTITUTION HALL - DEQ (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

The Hawk - Farmington Hills Community Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Hawk - Farmington Hills Community Center averages 0.8 TCR (25% of the Community recreation programs, government BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Hawk - Farmington Hills Community Center TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=1.6 · BLS 3.2

Where The Hawk - Farmington Hills Community Center falls in its industry

413 Community recreation programs, establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 26 Community recreation programs, employers in Michigan.

The Hawk - Farmington Hills Community Center (440 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate The Hawk - Farmington Hills Community Center
The Hawk - Farmington Hills Community Center (440 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.0

The Hawk - Farmington Hills Community Center has more employees than the Community recreation programs, governmen median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.6 0.8 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

924120 · MI · Farmington Hills

413 Community recreation programs, government employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 168 employers in Farmington Hills, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CONSTITUTION HALL - DEQ 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Azusa - Recreation 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Recreation Department 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR NRS-St. Paul 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dakkota Integrated Systems 440 FTE
STATE-SIZE KALAMAZOO PSYCH HSPL - DHHS 440 FTE
STATE-SIZE Monroe Location - DRIV AUTOMOTIVE INC 441 FTE
STATE-SIZE Holland - DE 439 FTE
CITY-NEAR Centria Healthcare LLC 3,648 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2250-517 2,497 FTE
CITY-NEAR Beechview Elementary 1,317 FTE
CITY-NEAR Facilities Management 1,317 FTE
NAT-TCR Minton Door Company 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Capp Electric 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Robert H. Finke & Sons Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Unit #1751 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Providential Bba Operating Lp 440 FTE
NAT-SIZE 27-11 49th Avenue 440 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ocean Lakes Service Corp. 440 FTE
NAT-SIZE Schuman Cheese Elgin 440 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.