Construction management, oil and gas pipeline · Pennsylvania

The Hillis Group, pLLC

Easton, PA · ~83 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Hillis Group, pLLC runs at 53% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Construction management, oil and gas pipeline workplace, earning a grade B.

The Hillis Group, pLLC: 1.5 TCR = 53% of Construction management, oil and gas pipeline BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Hillis Group, pLLC safety composite

The Hillis Group, pLLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 1.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.4

2016→2024

The Hillis Group, pLLC injury rate improved

The Hillis Group, pLLC's TCR fell 6.4 from 6.4 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 6.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.4 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=2.4 · 2019=1.9 · 2020=1.3 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237120 · Easton, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.5 · 53% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #27/45
  • PHOTO B. Jackson Construct…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~83 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: B. Jackson Construction & Engineering, LLC - Utah (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

The Hillis Group, pLLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Hillis Group, pLLC averages 1.5 TCR (53% of the Construction management, oil and gas pipeline BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Hillis Group, pLLC TCR series: 2016=6.4 · 2017=0 · 2018=2.4 · 2019=1.9 · 2020=1.3 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where The Hillis Group, pLLC falls in its industry

809 Construction management, oil a establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #27 safest of 45 Construction management, oil a employers in Pennsylvania.

The Hillis Group, pLLC (83 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 137 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 01234 Average employees Total Case Rate The Hillis Group, pLLC
The Hillis Group, pLLC (83 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 137 employees and a TCR of 0.7

The Hillis Group, pLLC has fewer employees than the Construction management, oil and gas pip median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 1.3 0.0 1 0 0
2019 1.9 1.4 4 0 0
2018 2.4 1.0 4 1 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 6.4 2.8 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237120 · PA · Easton

809 Construction management, oil and gas pipeline employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 182 employers in Easton, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR B. Jackson Construction & Engineering, LLC - Utah 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR KS Energy Services (New Berlin) 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR SES Energy Services LLC 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR SiteWise Corporation 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE MD Basciani & Sons, Inc. 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corporate 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Henkels & McCoy, Inc - Ford City 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Penn Line Energy T & D, Inc. 83 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : ABE4 1,394 FTE
CITY-NEAR LAFAYETTE COLLEGE 1,338 FTE
CITY-NEAR Victaulic - Forks 1,277 FTE
CITY-NEAR Radial - Easton 2 1,181 FTE
NAT-TCR Prescott Valley 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Woodward Inc. - WTC Facility 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Nutri-Feeds, LLC 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Aveva Drug Delivery Systems, Inc. 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Genuine Parts Company 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southern Freight Services, Inc. of Morristown DBA Southern Freight Services, Inc. 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arctic Express, Inc 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trader Joe's 0152 Clackamas 83 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.