Children's hospitals, specialty (except psychiatric, substance abuse) · District of Columbia

The Hospital for Sick Children

Washington, DC · ~278 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Hospital for Sick Children runs at 26% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Children's hospitals, specialty (except psychiatric, substance abuse) workplace, earning a grade A.

The Hospital for Sick Children: 1.0 TCR = 26% of Children's hospitals, specialty (except psychiatric, substance abuse) BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Hospital for Sick Children safety composite

The Hospital for Sick Children scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 97% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 97% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Hospital for Sick Children: 0.0 → 2.0 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 2.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1× in 2017

The Hospital for Sick Children's TCR rose 2.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 2.0 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622310 · Washington, DC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 26% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #1/5
  • PHOTO Baylor Scott & White…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~278 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Baylor Scott & White Emergency Hospital Burleson (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · District of Columbia employers → · Look up another →

The Hospital for Sick Children in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Hospital for Sick Children averages 1.0 TCR (26% of the Children's hospitals, specialty (except psychiatric, substance abuse) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Hospital for Sick Children TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=2 · BLS 3.8

Where The Hospital for Sick Children falls in its industry

1,390 Children's hospitals, specialt establishments

Safer than 97% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to District of Columbia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 5 Children's hospitals, specialt employers in District of Columbia.

The Hospital for Sick Children (278 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 160 employees and a TCR of 5.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate The Hospital for Sick Children
The Hospital for Sick Children (278 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 160 employees and a TCR of 5.4

The Hospital for Sick Children has more employees than the Children's hospitals, specialty (except median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 2.0 1.0 4 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622310 · DC · Washington

1,390 Children's hospitals, specialty (except psychiatric, substance abuse) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 793 rated employers in District of Columbia with headcount on file · 748 employers in Washington, DC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Baylor Scott & White Emergency Hospital Burleson 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kennedy Krieger Pact 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR H4508 KH OCALA 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wesley Woods Health Cntr 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE SLEDGE, LLC 276 FTE
STATE-SIZE Delta Air Lines - DCA 281 FTE
STATE-SIZE GWMFA 2300M 274 FTE
STATE-SIZE Community Connections, Inc. 283 FTE
CITY-NEAR Children's National Medical Center 7,153 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medstar Washington Hospital Center 7,073 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medstar Georgetown University Hospital 4,771 FTE
CITY-NEAR Customs and Border Protection - Headquarters 3,601 FTE
NAT-TCR HMA Contracting Corp. 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR HBSHSEMD26 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Legends - Gorge Amphitheatre 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Bombardier Transportation - Orlando - MCO 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Giant Carlisle 6442 278 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fontana (Cafna) 278 FTE
NAT-SIZE Forest Products Facility 278 FTE
NAT-SIZE Glen Ellyn 278 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.