Chemical milling job shops · New Jersey

The Jet Pulverizer Co., Inc.

Moorestown, NJ · ~26 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Jet Pulverizer Co., Inc. runs at 258% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Chemical milling job shops workplace, earning a grade F.

The Jet Pulverizer Co., Inc.: 8.5 TCR = 258% of Chemical milling job shops BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Jet Pulverizer Co., Inc. safety composite

The Jet Pulverizer Co., Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.2

2016→2023

The Jet Pulverizer Co., Inc. injury rate improved

The Jet Pulverizer Co., Inc.'s TCR fell 2.2 from 11.2 in 2016 to 9.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 14.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.71× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=11.2 · 2017=12.1 · 2018=14.3 · 2019=8.8 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=4.2 · 2023=9.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332710 · Moorestown, NJ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.5 · 258% of ind

  • DART 6.0 DART
  • RANK #16/18
  • PHOTO C&C Fabrication LLC
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: C&C Fabrication LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

The Jet Pulverizer Co., Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Jet Pulverizer Co., Inc. averages 8.5 TCR (258% of the Chemical milling job shops BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Jet Pulverizer Co., Inc. TCR series: 2016=11.2 · 2017=12.1 · 2018=14.3 · 2019=8.8 · 2020=0 · 2021=4.2 · 2023=9 · BLS 3.3

Where The Jet Pulverizer Co., Inc. falls in its industry

1,821 Chemical milling job shops establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 18 Chemical milling job shops employers in New Jersey.

The Jet Pulverizer Co., Inc. (26 employees, TCR 8.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate The Jet Pulverizer Co., Inc.
The Jet Pulverizer Co., Inc. (26 employees, TCR 8.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 3.5

The Jet Pulverizer Co., Inc. has fewer employees than the Chemical milling job shops median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 9.0 6.0 2 1 0
2021 4.2 4.2 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 8.8 2.9 3 0 0
2018 14.3 3.6 4 0 0
2017 12.1 0.0 1 2 0
2016 11.2 7.5 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332710 · NJ · Moorestown

1,821 Chemical milling job shops employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 96 employers in Moorestown, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR C&C Fabrication LLC 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Metal Technologies Inc. 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lindsay Machine Works Inc 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Rose Corporation 8.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Phoenix Diversified Group, Inc. 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kiely Pipeline Integrity 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rockborn Trucking & Excavation, Inc 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Phoenix Marine Co.DE, LLC 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US NJ Moorestown Bortn Lndg Rd (1015) 3,322 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Moorestown Campus (1015) 2,237 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US NJ Mount Laurel Tech Campus (1450) 1,731 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Tech Campus (1450) 1,342 FTE
NAT-TCR Trego/Dugan Aviation, Inc. Bdl 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR DATTCO - North Smithfield 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Mira Loma Terminal 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Vitro Flat Glass LLC 8.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Midwest Doors, Inc. 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Y. Hata & Co. Limited - Hilo 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fleet Service of Tulsa LLC 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Steelhead Composites Headquarters 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.