Hotels (except casino hotels) · Florida

The JW Marriott Orlando, Grande Lakes

Orlando, FL · ~514 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The JW Marriott Orlando, Grande Lakes runs at 67% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Hotels (except casino hotels) workplace, earning a grade B.

The JW Marriott Orlando, Grande Lakes: 2.0 TCR = 67% of Hotels (except casino hotels) BLS 3.0 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The JW Marriott Orlando, Grande Lakes safety composite

The JW Marriott Orlando, Grande Lakes scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The JW Marriott Orlando, Grande Lakes: 1.3 → 2.4 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 2.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.21× in 2021

The JW Marriott Orlando, Grande Lakes's TCR rose 1.2 from 1.3 in 2016 to 2.4 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 1.21× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721110 · Orlando, FL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 67% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #144/881
  • PHOTO Staybridge Suites
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~514 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Staybridge Suites (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

The JW Marriott Orlando, Grande Lakes in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The JW Marriott Orlando, Grande Lakes averages 2.0 TCR (67% of the Hotels (except casino hotels) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The JW Marriott Orlando, Grande Lakes TCR series: 2016=1.3 · 2017=2.3 · 2021=2.4 · BLS 3.0

Where The JW Marriott Orlando, Grande Lakes falls in its industry

9,342 Hotels (except casino hotels) establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #144 safest of 881 Hotels (except casino hotels) employers in Florida.

The JW Marriott Orlando, Grande Lakes (514 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate The JW Marriott Orlando, Grande Lakes
The JW Marriott Orlando, Grande Lakes (514 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8

The JW Marriott Orlando, Grande Lakes has more employees than the Hotels (except casino hotels) median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 2.4 2.4 6 0 0
2017 2.3 1.4 10 0 0
2016 1.3 0.8 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721110 · FL · Orlando

9,342 Hotels (except casino hotels) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,997 employers in Orlando, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Staybridge Suites 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Renaissance New Orleans Arts Warehouse District Hotel 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Residence Inn Bozeman 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Angad Arts Hotel St Louis 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Physicians Regional Healthcare System -Collier 514 FTE
STATE-SIZE Systems : Jacksonville, FL 515 FTE
STATE-SIZE Breakthru Beverage Florida - Tampa 515 FTE
STATE-SIZE 5420 513 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universal Orlando Resort 20,343 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universal Parks and Resorts : UO 13,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR ADVENTHEALTH ORLANDO 11,412 FTE
CITY-NEAR Florida Hospital Orlando 10,318 FTE
NAT-TCR Bull Bond-Caguas 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Santa Fe Spings - Dice Rd 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Kansas Line 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookshires #004 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Corporate Office Lafayette 514 FTE
NAT-SIZE Blessing Business Center 514 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6795-99625B0499 514 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bishop Rehabilitation and Nursing Center 514 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.