Grinding and milling botanicals (i.e., for medicinal use) · Michigan
The Lab Processing and Co-packing
Kalkaska, MI · ~46 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- B
- Good Safety Record
- 2.3
- Avg TCR
- 3.3
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
The Lab Processing and Co-packing runs at 70% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Grinding and milling botanicals (i.e., for medicinal use) workplace, earning a grade B.
- B
- Good Safety Record
- 2.3
- avg TCR · per 100 workers
- 3.3
- industry benchmark (BLS)
- 1
- recordable injuries tracked
Grade compares The Lab Processing and Co-packing's OSHA Total Case Rate to the BLS industry benchmark across 2 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). This reflects reported recordable injuries, not an independent safety inspection -- underreporting is a known limitation of employer self-recordkeeping.
Injury rate over time
The Lab Processing and Co-packing's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 3.3 industry benchmark.
Where The Lab Processing and Co-packing falls in its industry
301 Grinding and milling botanical establishmentsSafer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.
Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 8 Grinding and milling botanical employers in Michigan.
The Lab Processing and Co-packing has an average TCR of 2.3, which is 70% of the industry average (3.3) for Grinding and milling botanicals (i.e., for medicinal use). This is better than average.
The letter grade is a transparent derived index PlainSafetyScore computes from public OSHA ITA and BLS benchmark data, not an official OSHA rating or safety certification. Full formula and thresholds: Methodology.
Trend analysis for The Lab Processing and Co-packing
Between 2023 and 2024, The Lab Processing and Co-packing's Total Case Rate held roughly steady from 0.0 to 4.6 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 0% change across 1 year of OSHA reporting.
The safest year on record was 2023, at a TCR of 0.0, while 2024 saw the highest rate, at 4.6, a spread of 4.6 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a wide swing relative to the establishment's overall rate, worth checking the year-by-year table below for whether a single severe year is driving the average, rather than a sustained trend.
Summed across those 2 reporting years, The Lab Processing and Co-packing recorded 1 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 2-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.
Verify This Employer with OSHA
All injury, illness, and fatality figures on this page are sourced from The Lab Processing and Co-packing's own mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.
Verify on OSHA Establishment SearchSource: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 325411 - Grinding and milling botanicals (i.e., for medicinal use).
DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2024)
DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.
1 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 86,295 hours worked = 2.32 DART
Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping
Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State
| Benchmark | TCR | Source |
|---|---|---|
| The Lab Processing and Co-packing (this establishment) | 2.32 | OSHA ITA Form 300A, 2-year avg |
| Vitamins, uncompounded, manufacturing industry avg | 3.30 | BLS IIF, NAICS 325411 |
| Michigan state avg (all industries) | 4.73 | OSHA ITA, state-level rollup |
Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program
Reportable Incident Timeline
Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by The Lab Processing and Co-packing to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.
- 2024: 2 reportable incidents · 1 injuries, 1 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2023: 0 reportable incidents · 0 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 4.6 | 2.3 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| 2023 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
What this grade means for you
Use this grade as a relative read on The Lab Processing and Co-packing's reported OSHA injury record, strong versus its Grinding and milling botanicals (i.e., for medicinal use) peers, but not a guarantee about any single site today.
- At 70% of the Grinding and milling botanicals (i.e., for medicinal use) benchmark, The Lab Processing and Co-packing reports fewer injuries than typical peers, still worth asking how safety is managed day to day. Know your rights
- Judge this record against the wider Grinding and milling botanicals (i.e., for medicinal use) sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
- Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another
Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is The Lab Processing and Co-packing's safety grade?
How many injuries has The Lab Processing and Co-packing reported?
Similar Employers
Matched by safety record across the industry and by workforce size within Michigan - a different peer set than the category browse links below.
Similar TCR (~2.3)
Explore More Safety Data
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Related
Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.