Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Oregon

The Landing Senior Living

Roseburg, OR · ~49 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Landing Senior Living runs at 253% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

The Landing Senior Living: 9.6 TCR = 253% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Landing Senior Living safety composite

The Landing Senior Living scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 59% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.6

2021→2022

The Landing Senior Living injury rate improved

The Landing Senior Living's TCR fell 5.6 from 12.4 in 2021 to 6.8 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 12.4 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.24× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=12.4 · 2022=6.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Roseburg, OR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.6 · 253% of ind

  • DART 2.3 DART
  • RANK #107/218
  • PHOTO Westwood Commons
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~49 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Westwood Commons (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

The Landing Senior Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Landing Senior Living averages 9.6 TCR (253% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Landing Senior Living TCR series: 2021=12.4 · 2022=6.8 · BLS 3.8

Where The Landing Senior Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 33% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #107 safest of 218 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Oregon.

The Landing Senior Living (49 employees, TCR 9.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Landing Senior Living
The Landing Senior Living (49 employees, TCR 9.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

The Landing Senior Living has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 6.8 2.3 3 0 0
2021 12.4 9.9 4 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · OR · Roseburg

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 125 employers in Roseburg, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Westwood Commons 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Elderwood Village @ Fairport 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR CrownPointe of Anderson 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oak Creek Alzheimer's & Dementia Care Center 9.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Polehn Farms Inc 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fessler Nursery Company 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE UNIVERSAL SEED LLC 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sunnyview (Shared Services + MVS Admin + Warehouse) 49 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Outpatient Lab 5,503 FTE
CITY-NEAR Foundation, Community Education, Healthy Kids 1,066 FTE
CITY-NEAR Evergreen Family Medicine Lab - Mercy Laboratory 1,027 FTE
CITY-NEAR Evergreen Family Medicine - Mercy Imaging 1,022 FTE
NAT-TCR 1911 Saville Row Retail Operations Center 9.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Rock & Metal Systems, Inc. 9.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Arrow Concrete & Asphalt Specialties Inc 9.6 TCR
NAT-TCR AmSource 9.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE DSI Holdings Corporation 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Underground Company 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Firststeps for Kids Ventura 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Miller-Davis Company 49 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.