Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Georgia

The Landings of Columbus

Columbus, GA · ~28 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Landings of Columbus runs at 317% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

The Landings of Columbus: 12.0 TCR = 317% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Landings of Columbus safety composite

The Landings of Columbus scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.6

2018→2021

The Landings of Columbus injury rate improved

The Landings of Columbus's TCR fell 8.6 from 18.9 in 2018 to 10.3 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 18.9 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=18.9 · 2019=10.2 · 2020=8.7 · 2021=10.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Columbus, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.0 · 317% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #158/205
  • PHOTO Hughson Samaritan Vi…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hughson Samaritan Village (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

The Landings of Columbus in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Landings of Columbus averages 12.0 TCR (317% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Landings of Columbus TCR series: 2018=18.9 · 2019=10.2 · 2020=8.7 · 2021=10.3 · BLS 3.8

Where The Landings of Columbus falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #158 safest of 205 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Georgia.

The Landings of Columbus (28 employees, TCR 12.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Landings of Columbus
The Landings of Columbus (28 employees, TCR 12.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

The Landings of Columbus has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 10.3 0.0 2 0 0
2020 8.7 4.3 2 0 0
2019 10.2 6.8 2 1 0
2018 18.9 4.7 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · GA · Columbus

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 291 employers in Columbus, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hughson Samaritan Village 12.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Spring Lake Assisted Living and Memory Care 12.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 10284 12.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 10435 12.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Unlimited Contract Services Blackshear AEP 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Unlimited Contract Services - Waelder, TX 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hatchery 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Georgia Forest Products, Inc 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR ST FRANCIS HEALTH LLC 2,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR Piedmont Columbus Midtown Hospital 1,890 FTE
CITY-NEAR P&W Columbus, Georgia Site (Main Campus) 1,838 FTE
CITY-NEAR Paul S Amos Campus 1,748 FTE
NAT-TCR 086834-Seymour Po 12.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Patterson Logistics Services 5 12.0 TCR
NAT-TCR A&M Dittrich Mink Farm 12.0 TCR
NAT-TCR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : SNA4 12.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE IMI Precision Engineering 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fire & Life Safety America San Antonio 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Coventry Zebulon 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ambassador Steel-Kansas City Missouri 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.