Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Hughson Samaritan Village

Hughson, CA · ~138 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hughson Samaritan Village runs at 317% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Hughson Samaritan Village: 12.0 TCR = 317% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hughson Samaritan Village safety composite

Hughson Samaritan Village scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

38/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.2

2017→2024

Hughson Samaritan Village injury rate improved

Hughson Samaritan Village's TCR fell 3.2 from 11.1 in 2017 to 7.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 18.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.29× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=11.1 · 2018=13.0 · 2020=5.4 · 2022=18.4 · 2023=16.4 · 2024=7.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Hughson, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 12.0 · 317% of ind

  • DART 3.5 DART
  • RANK #434/635
  • PHOTO Spring Lake Assisted…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 79 inj
  • SIZE ~138 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Spring Lake Assisted Living and Memory Care (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Hughson Samaritan Village in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hughson Samaritan Village averages 12.0 TCR (317% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hughson Samaritan Village TCR series: 2017=11.1 · 2018=13 · 2020=5.4 · 2022=18.4 · 2023=16.4 · 2024=7.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Hughson Samaritan Village falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #434 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Hughson Samaritan Village (138 employees, TCR 12.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Hughson Samaritan Village
Hughson Samaritan Village (138 employees, TCR 12.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Hughson Samaritan Village has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.9 3.5 9 0 0
2023 16.4 6.4 17 1 0
2022 18.4 8.3 20 0 0
2020 5.4 2.7 6 0 0
2018 13.0 6.9 15 0 0
2017 11.1 7.4 12 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Hughson

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 29 employers in Hughson, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Spring Lake Assisted Living and Memory Care 12.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Landings of Columbus 12.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 10284 12.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 10435 12.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Westerlay Orchids LP 138 FTE
STATE-SIZE Danell Custom Harvesting LLC - DCH629 138 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sustainable Labor Solutions, Inc 138 FTE
STATE-SIZE RLH Fire Protection 138 FTE
CITY-NEAR Duarte Nursery Inc. 367 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3118_6025 303 FTE
CITY-NEAR Office/Processing 273 FTE
CITY-NEAR Grower Direct Nut Company 226 FTE
NAT-TCR Parks & Recreation 12.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Edgewood Minot 12.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Synergy Colfax C-Store 12.0 TCR
NAT-TCR LL Automotive Services Two, LLC 12.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE ViaSun Corporation 138 FTE
NAT-SIZE Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corporation 138 FTE
NAT-SIZE C&B Piping, Inc. 138 FTE
NAT-SIZE Poly Vinyl Co. 138 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.