Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Arizona

The Landings of Prescott Valley

Prescott Valley, AZ · ~51 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
16.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Landings of Prescott Valley runs at 432% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

The Landings of Prescott Valley: 16.4 TCR = 432% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Landings of Prescott Valley safety composite

The Landings of Prescott Valley scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 16.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.4

2022→2024

The Landings of Prescott Valley injury rate improved

The Landings of Prescott Valley's TCR fell 10.4 from 23.0 in 2022 to 12.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 23.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.46× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=23.0 · 2023=13.7 · 2024=12.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Prescott Valley, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 16.4 · 432% of ind

  • DART 7.5 DART
  • RANK #156/173
  • PHOTO Rosemore Village
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~51 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Rosemore Village (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

The Landings of Prescott Valley in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Landings of Prescott Valley averages 16.4 TCR (432% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Landings of Prescott Valley TCR series: 2022=23 · 2023=13.7 · 2024=12.6 · BLS 3.8

Where The Landings of Prescott Valley falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 10% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #156 safest of 173 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Arizona.

The Landings of Prescott Valley (51 employees, TCR 16.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Landings of Prescott Valley
The Landings of Prescott Valley (51 employees, TCR 16.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

The Landings of Prescott Valley has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 12.6 7.5 5 0 0
2023 13.7 6.9 6 0 0
2022 23.0 11.5 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · AZ · Prescott Valley

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 55 employers in Prescott Valley, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Rosemore Village 16.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Inspired Living Ocoee 16.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR MBK - The Commons at Elk Grove 16.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Artis Senior Living of Commack 16.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Salubrious Wellness Clinic Inc 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mission Citrus 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lennar Multi-Family - AZ (SW) 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE PSHIA T4-S1 51 FTE
CITY-NEAR HUMBOLDT UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 692 FTE
CITY-NEAR Yavapai Regional Medical Center-East 563 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prescott Valley Retail Support Center - Ace Hardware 390 FTE
CITY-NEAR MI Windows and Doors 362 FTE
NAT-TCR 0589 - Chambersburg PA DC 16.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Risser's Poultry Handling Services, LLC 16.4 TCR
NAT-TCR St. Claire HealthCare 16.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 11720 Providence 16.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Landings of Canton Hills 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wellington Oaks 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Riverside, CA - 2358 Cottonwood Ave 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Circle City Cleaners One, LLC 51 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.