Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · North Carolina

The Landings of Rocky Mount Mills

Rocky Mount, NC · ~43 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Landings of Rocky Mount Mills runs at 210% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

The Landings of Rocky Mount Mills: 8.0 TCR = 210% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Landings of Rocky Mount Mills safety composite

The Landings of Rocky Mount Mills scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Landings of Rocky Mount Mills: 0.0 → 15.9 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 15.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.4× in 2024

The Landings of Rocky Mount Mills's TCR rose 15.9 from 0.0 in 2023 to 15.9 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Rocky Mount, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.0 · 210% of ind

  • DART 3.2 DART
  • RANK #237/356
  • PHOTO Brookdale Liverpool
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brookdale Liverpool (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

The Landings of Rocky Mount Mills in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Landings of Rocky Mount Mills averages 8.0 TCR (210% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Landings of Rocky Mount Mills TCR series: 2023=0 · 2024=15.9 · BLS 3.8

Where The Landings of Rocky Mount Mills falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #237 safest of 356 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in North Carolina.

The Landings of Rocky Mount Mills (43 employees, TCR 8.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Landings of Rocky Mount Mills
The Landings of Rocky Mount Mills (43 employees, TCR 8.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

The Landings of Rocky Mount Mills has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 15.9 3.2 5 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NC · Rocky Mount

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 121 employers in Rocky Mount, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Liverpool 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Mandeville 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2248-63224 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 305 West End Avenue Operating LLC 8.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE LEWIS NURSERY 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Little Man Farming INC 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE NC Grow Out 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Bern Complex 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hospira, a Pfizer Company 2,819 FTE
CITY-NEAR QVC Rocky Mount, Inc. 1,177 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Rocky Mount 1,161 FTE
CITY-NEAR Barnhill Contracting Company 982 FTE
NAT-TCR Cawtd - Carmel Village 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookdale Mandeville 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Venture Corporation 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Athena Farms 8.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lebanon TN Truss 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE FV Clinics-New Brighton 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Composite Energy Technologies 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Residence Inn Portland Downtown Riverplace 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.