Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Kentucky

The Lantern at Morning Pointe Lexington

Lexington, KY · ~44 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Lantern at Morning Pointe Lexington runs at 177% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

The Lantern at Morning Pointe Lexington: 6.7 TCR = 177% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Lantern at Morning Pointe Lexington safety composite

The Lantern at Morning Pointe Lexington scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 58% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.2

2016→2017

The Lantern at Morning Pointe Lexington injury rate improved

The Lantern at Morning Pointe Lexington's TCR fell 8.2 from 10.8 in 2016 to 2.6 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 10.8 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=10.8 · 2017=2.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Lexington, KY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.7 · 177% of ind

  • DART 2.6 DART
  • RANK #20/56
  • PHOTO SummerWood of Chanha…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SummerWood of Chanhassen (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kentucky employers → · Look up another →

The Lantern at Morning Pointe Lexington in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Lantern at Morning Pointe Lexington averages 6.7 TCR (177% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Lantern at Morning Pointe Lexington TCR series: 2016=10.8 · 2017=2.6 · BLS 3.8

Where The Lantern at Morning Pointe Lexington falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kentucky alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #20 safest of 56 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Kentucky.

The Lantern at Morning Pointe Lexington (44 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate The Lantern at Morning Pointe Lexington
The Lantern at Morning Pointe Lexington (44 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

The Lantern at Morning Pointe Lexington has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2016 10.8 8.1 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · KY · Lexington

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,805 rated employers in Kentucky with headcount on file · 652 employers in Lexington, KY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SummerWood of Chanhassen 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cypress Cove at HealthPark Florida 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Legend at Fort Worth 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arden Courts of Parma 6.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE DMK Development Group 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE SC630 - Louisville, KY 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE R. J. Corman Signaling Company, LLC 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jett's Specialty Contracting, LLC 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Kentucky - Main Campus - Fayette County 11,013 FTE
CITY-NEAR UK Healthcare 9,922 FTE
CITY-NEAR YMCA of Central KY - Gatton Beaumont 3,933 FTE
CITY-NEAR YMCA of Central Ky - High Street 3,895 FTE
NAT-TCR Janesville Acoustics- Richmond 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Plant R2 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Iron Hill Brewery- Chestnut Hill 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR J-S Sherman Operations, LP D/B/A The Homestead of Sherman 6.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Santa Anita 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE N and R of Chillicothe Inc 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ashland Nursing and Rehab LLC 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Insys Manufacturing, LLC 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.