Continuing care retirement communities · Florida

Cypress Cove at HealthPark Florida

Fort Myers, FL · ~406 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cypress Cove at HealthPark Florida runs at 177% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade D.

Cypress Cove at HealthPark Florida: 6.7 TCR = 177% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cypress Cove at HealthPark Florida safety composite

Cypress Cove at HealthPark Florida scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2016→2023

Cypress Cove at HealthPark Florida injury rate improved

Cypress Cove at HealthPark Florida's TCR fell 0.4 from 8.1 in 2016 to 7.7 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 8.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.74× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.1 · 2017=6.7 · 2018=7.2 · 2021=4.9 · 2022=5.8 · 2023=7.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Fort Myers, FL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.7 · 177% of ind

  • DART 5.0 DART
  • RANK #139/283
  • PHOTO SummerWood of Chanha…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 119 inj
  • SIZE ~406 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SummerWood of Chanhassen (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Cypress Cove at HealthPark Florida in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cypress Cove at HealthPark Florida averages 6.7 TCR (177% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cypress Cove at HealthPark Florida TCR series: 2016=8.1 · 2017=6.7 · 2018=7.2 · 2021=4.9 · 2022=5.8 · 2023=7.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Cypress Cove at HealthPark Florida falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #139 safest of 283 Continuing care retirement com employers in Florida.

Cypress Cove at HealthPark Florida (406 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Cypress Cove at HealthPark Florida
Cypress Cove at HealthPark Florida (406 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Cypress Cove at HealthPark Florida has more employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 7.7 5.0 22 1 0
2022 5.8 3.1 16 1 0
2021 4.9 2.1 14 0 0
2018 7.2 2.9 24 1 0
2017 6.7 4.1 22 1 0
2016 8.1 5.0 21 5 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · FL · Fort Myers

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 484 employers in Fort Myers, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SummerWood of Chanhassen 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Lantern at Morning Pointe Lexington 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Legend at Fort Worth 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arden Courts of Parma 6.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Terrasmart LLC 406 FTE
STATE-SIZE CCK Construction Services Inc. 406 FTE
STATE-SIZE RIVIERA BEACH FL 406 FTE
STATE-SIZE On-Shore Wind : Pensacola, FL, USA 406 FTE
CITY-NEAR CCI-DANIELS LLC 2,935 FTE
CITY-NEAR Home Health Ft Myers 2,476 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shell Point Retirement Communty 1,071 FTE
CITY-NEAR Christian & Missionary Alliance Foundation, inc. 1,014 FTE
NAT-TCR American Plumbing 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR L&M Warehouse & Packing Inc 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR RK-039-Van Wert ( RK-039 ) 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Henry Schein - MDBAL 6.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Companions Forever LLC 406 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shaw's Methuen Distribution Center 406 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ferrara Candy Company 406 FTE
NAT-SIZE Glastonbury Town Hall 406 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.