Pressure treated lumber made from purchased lumber · Minnesota

UFP White Bear Lake, LLC

White Bear Lake, MN · ~52 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

UFP White Bear Lake, LLC runs at 136% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Pressure treated lumber made from purchased lumber workplace, earning a grade D.

UFP White Bear Lake, LLC: 4.5 TCR = 136% of Pressure treated lumber made from purchased lumber BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

UFP White Bear Lake, LLC safety composite

UFP White Bear Lake, LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.8

2018→2024

UFP White Bear Lake, LLC injury rate improved

UFP White Bear Lake, LLC's TCR fell 4.8 from 4.8 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 10.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=4.8 · 2019=1.4 · 2020=10.1 · 2021=10.3 · 2022=1.9 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321114 · White Bear Lake, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.5 · 136% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/4
  • PHOTO McAlisterville
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: McAlisterville (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

UFP White Bear Lake, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows UFP White Bear Lake, LLC averages 4.5 TCR (136% of the Pressure treated lumber made from purchased lumber BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

UFP White Bear Lake, LLC TCR series: 2018=4.8 · 2019=1.4 · 2020=10.1 · 2021=10.3 · 2022=1.9 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where UFP White Bear Lake, LLC falls in its industry

183 Pressure treated lumber made f establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 4 Pressure treated lumber made f employers in Minnesota.

UFP White Bear Lake, LLC (52 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate UFP White Bear Lake, LLC
UFP White Bear Lake, LLC (52 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.3

UFP White Bear Lake, LLC has more employees than the Pressure treated lumber made from purcha median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.9 0.0 1 0 0
2022 1.9 1.9 0 1 0
2021 10.3 6.2 2 3 0
2020 10.1 4.0 5 0 0
2019 1.4 0.0 1 0 0
2018 4.8 3.2 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321114 · MN · White Bear Lake

183 Pressure treated lumber made from purchased lumber employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 88 employers in White Bear Lake, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR McAlisterville 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Whitewood - 1340 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR UFP Janesville, LLC 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Desoto Treated Materials 4.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hutchinson Utilities Commission 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kasella Concrete, Inc. 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bargen Incorporated 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sheehy Construction Company 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR White Bear Lake Area Schools 1,280 FTE
CITY-NEAR Carlson Building Maintenance, Inc. 693 FTE
CITY-NEAR Carlson Building Maintenance Corporate Office 667 FTE
CITY-NEAR Century College 557 FTE
NAT-TCR The Laurels of Hudsonville 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Little Falls Hospital 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Sejong Alabama LLC 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Waste Control Recycling Inc. 4.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Florham Park 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE 06000-06-06-EUGENE 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Country Charm 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Buzz Oates 52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.