Continuing care retirement communities · Maryland

The Lutheran Village at Miller's Grant

Ellicott City, MD · ~221 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Lutheran Village at Miller's Grant runs at 182% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade D.

The Lutheran Village at Miller's Grant: 6.9 TCR = 182% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Lutheran Village at Miller's Grant safety composite

The Lutheran Village at Miller's Grant scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 46%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

The Lutheran Village at Miller's Grant held a steady TCR band

The Lutheran Village at Miller's Grant's TCR held near 0.1 from 6.9 in 2018 to 6.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 9.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.57× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=6.9 · 2019=7.3 · 2022=9.5 · 2023=4.0 · 2024=6.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Ellicott City, MD ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.9 · 182% of ind

  • DART 3.9 DART
  • RANK #47/87
  • PHOTO Creekside Oaks
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 34 inj
  • SIZE ~221 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Creekside Oaks (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

The Lutheran Village at Miller's Grant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Lutheran Village at Miller's Grant averages 6.9 TCR (182% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Lutheran Village at Miller's Grant TCR series: 2018=6.9 · 2019=7.3 · 2022=9.5 · 2023=4 · 2024=6.9 · BLS 3.8

Where The Lutheran Village at Miller's Grant falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #47 safest of 87 Continuing care retirement com employers in Maryland.

The Lutheran Village at Miller's Grant (221 employees, TCR 6.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate The Lutheran Village at Miller's Grant
The Lutheran Village at Miller's Grant (221 employees, TCR 6.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

The Lutheran Village at Miller's Grant has more employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.9 3.9 7 0 0
2023 4.0 4.0 4 0 0
2022 9.5 4.2 9 0 0
2019 7.3 3.1 7 0 0
2018 6.9 2.0 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · MD · Ellicott City

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 37 employers in Ellicott City, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Creekside Oaks 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR John Knox Village of Florida 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Florida Baptist Retirement Center 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR NRV 6.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE K&L Microwave 222 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fila USA, Inc. Brandon Woods Distribution Center 222 FTE
STATE-SIZE White Marsh 091 222 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1890 - Prince Georges Plaza 222 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2412 364 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2412 343 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1042 - Ellicott City 279 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ellicott City Healthcare Center 165 FTE
NAT-TCR Fireclay Tile Spokane 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR C To C Logistics LLC 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Celina Oh - 3244 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR GFL Environmental Cadillac Hauling 6.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE PA035 221 FTE
NAT-SIZE 10273 South Glenn 221 FTE
NAT-SIZE Acousti Engineering Orlando 221 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bellevue Ne - 3109 221 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.