Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · North Carolina

The Magnolia

Clinton, NC · ~50 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Magnolia runs at 78% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade B.

The Magnolia: 3.0 TCR = 78% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Magnolia safety composite

The Magnolia scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

The Magnolia held a steady TCR band

The Magnolia's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 9.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=6.3 · 2018=9.2 · 2019=2.0 · 2020=4.4 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=2.3 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Clinton, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 3.0 · 78% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #60/356
  • PHOTO Brookdale Winter Hav…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brookdale Winter Haven-MC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

The Magnolia in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Magnolia averages 3.0 TCR (78% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Magnolia TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=6.3 · 2018=9.2 · 2019=2 · 2020=4.4 · 2021=0 · 2022=2.3 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where The Magnolia falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #60 safest of 356 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in North Carolina.

The Magnolia (50 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Magnolia
The Magnolia (50 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

The Magnolia has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.4 2.4 1 0 0
2022 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 4.4 2.2 1 1 0
2019 2.0 0.0 1 0 0
2018 9.2 7.4 5 0 0
2017 6.3 2.1 3 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NC · Clinton

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 42 employers in Clinton, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Winter Haven-MC 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 10751 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Discovery Commons at Wildewood 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Shurmer Place at Altenheim 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Terrell and Johnny Williams 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wadesboro Hatchery / Transp 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Northern Region Office (Cary) 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE WEMC - Youngsville 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prestage Farms Inc. 786 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of Sampson 603 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sampson Reginal Medical Center 522 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2580 293 FTE
NAT-TCR CCSF, Department of Technology 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Taylor Machine Works 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Atlas MedStaff, LLC 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Peterbilt of Wisconsin, Inc. - Rockford 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Henry Bros. Co. 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE 129-DREES-HOUSTON 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Altorfer Inc. - Springfield, IL - 4949 International Parkway 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE CSI 3000 Inc 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.