Hospitals, general medical and surgical · Colorado

The Medical Center of Aurora North

Aurora, CO · ~224 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
4.6
Avg TCR
7.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Medical Center of Aurora North runs at 62% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Hospitals, general medical and surgical workplace, earning a grade B.

The Medical Center of Aurora North: 4.6 TCR = 62% of Hospitals, general medical and surgical BLS 7.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Medical Center of Aurora North safety composite

The Medical Center of Aurora North scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 58% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Medical Center of Aurora North: 0.0 → 4.2 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 9.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.77× in 2019

The Medical Center of Aurora North's TCR rose 4.2 from 0.0 in 2016 to 4.2 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 9.7 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.77× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622110 · Aurora, CO AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 4.6 · 62% of ind

  • DART 3.6 DART
  • RANK #41/101
  • PHOTO Baptist Health Medic…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 27 inj
  • SIZE ~224 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Baptist Health Medical Center - Heber Springs (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

The Medical Center of Aurora North in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Medical Center of Aurora North averages 4.6 TCR (62% of the Hospitals, general medical and surgical BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Medical Center of Aurora North TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=4.7 · 2018=9.7 · 2019=4.2 · BLS 7.5

Where The Medical Center of Aurora North falls in its industry

6,862 Hospitals, general medical and establishments

Safer than 58% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #41 safest of 101 Hospitals, general medical and employers in Colorado.

The Medical Center of Aurora North (224 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate The Medical Center of Aurora North
The Medical Center of Aurora North (224 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2

The Medical Center of Aurora North has fewer employees than the Hospitals, general medical and surgical median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 4.2 3.6 13 0 0
2018 9.7 4.4 11 0 0
2017 4.7 4.7 3 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622110 · CO · Aurora

6,862 Hospitals, general medical and surgical employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 497 employers in Aurora, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Baptist Health Medical Center - Heber Springs 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Waupun Memorial Hospital 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR WEXFORD HOSPITAL 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Piedmont Columbus Regional Systems 4.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE JHL Constructors, Inc. 224 FTE
STATE-SIZE Haynes Mechanical & Energy Solutions 224 FTE
STATE-SIZE 620-00116 224 FTE
STATE-SIZE 10147 Fort Collins 224 FTE
CITY-NEAR Children's Hospital Colorado 6,663 FTE
CITY-NEAR Raytheon_Aurora_CO 2,237 FTE
CITY-NEAR Primoris Renewable Energy 1,695 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - DEN5 1,601 FTE
NAT-TCR Brookdale Shadow Hills 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR SEKISUI Polymer Innovations, LLC 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-Swy 0025 3095 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Faf Ewr 4.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE 6753 Coppell Millwork 224 FTE
NAT-SIZE HE Medical Transportation 224 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harlee Manor 224 FTE
NAT-SIZE Good Shepherd Nursing Home 224 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.