Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Ohio

The Oaks at Bethesda

Zanesville, OH · ~71 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Oaks at Bethesda runs at 219% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

The Oaks at Bethesda: 8.3 TCR = 219% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Oaks at Bethesda safety composite

The Oaks at Bethesda scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 63% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−15.0

2016→2024

The Oaks at Bethesda injury rate improved

The Oaks at Bethesda's TCR fell 15.0 from 20.1 in 2016 to 5.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 20.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=20.1 · 2017=11.1 · 2018=5.4 · 2019=3.4 · 2020=11.6 · 2021=11.5 · 2022=1.7 · 2023=5.2 · 2024=5.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Zanesville, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.3 · 219% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #176/243
  • PHOTO Hearth and Home at E…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 35 inj
  • SIZE ~71 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hearth and Home at EL Camino (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

The Oaks at Bethesda in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Oaks at Bethesda averages 8.3 TCR (219% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Oaks at Bethesda TCR series: 2016=20.1 · 2017=11.1 · 2018=5.4 · 2019=3.4 · 2020=11.6 · 2021=11.5 · 2022=1.7 · 2023=5.2 · 2024=5.1 · BLS 3.8

Where The Oaks at Bethesda falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #176 safest of 243 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Ohio.

The Oaks at Bethesda (71 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Oaks at Bethesda
The Oaks at Bethesda (71 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

The Oaks at Bethesda has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.1 1.7 3 0 0
2023 5.2 3.4 3 0 0
2022 1.7 1.7 0 1 0
2021 11.5 11.5 2 4 0
2020 11.6 11.6 3 3 0
2019 3.4 3.4 2 0 0
2018 5.4 5.4 3 0 0
2017 11.1 9.2 6 0 0
2016 20.1 12.3 13 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · OH · Zanesville

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 139 employers in Zanesville, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hearth and Home at EL Camino 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6273_14731 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Cary 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Valleyview Assisted Living of Owatonna 8.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE DuPont Pioneer Grand Rapids Production GRA1 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rudolph Libbe Inc. - Ford Ohio Assembly Plant, Avon Lake 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE John G. Johnson Construction Office 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE R&R Pipeline Inc. 71 FTE
CITY-NEAR Genesis HealthCare Systems 3,395 FTE
CITY-NEAR Genesis HealthCare System 3,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR Zanesville DC 833 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0047-HES Zanesville 676 FTE
NAT-TCR Legacy Steel 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Duke University Hospital 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR CIT Trucks - Morton 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Mitchell-Hollingsworth Nursing & Rehabilitation Center (Dietary) 8.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Shasta Beverages Inc Houston 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE NJV 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Iroquois Bar Corp 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Skyline Roofing Inc. 71 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.