Retirement homes with nursing care · Pennsylvania

The Oaks at Pleasant Gap

Pleasant Gap, PA · ~31 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
5.1
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Oaks at Pleasant Gap runs at 78% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Retirement homes with nursing care workplace, earning a grade B.

The Oaks at Pleasant Gap: 5.1 TCR = 78% of Retirement homes with nursing care BLS 6.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Oaks at Pleasant Gap safety composite

The Oaks at Pleasant Gap scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

The Oaks at Pleasant Gap held a steady TCR band

The Oaks at Pleasant Gap's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 19.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=19.7 · 2022=10.8 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Pleasant Gap, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 5.1 · 78% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #184/754
  • PHOTO Heritage Hall Big St…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Heritage Hall Big Stone Gap (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

The Oaks at Pleasant Gap in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Oaks at Pleasant Gap averages 5.1 TCR (78% of the Retirement homes with nursing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Oaks at Pleasant Gap TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=19.7 · 2022=10.8 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 6.5

Where The Oaks at Pleasant Gap falls in its industry

15,252 Retirement homes with nursing establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #184 safest of 754 Retirement homes with nursing employers in Pennsylvania.

The Oaks at Pleasant Gap (31 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate The Oaks at Pleasant Gap
The Oaks at Pleasant Gap (31 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

The Oaks at Pleasant Gap has fewer employees than the Retirement homes with nursing care median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 10.8 0.0 1 1 0
2021 19.7 0.0 4 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · PA · Pleasant Gap

15,252 Retirement homes with nursing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 7 employers in Pleasant Gap, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Heritage Hall Big Stone Gap 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Topside Manor Inc 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Casa Coloma Healthcare Center 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Penick Village Inc. 5.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Spawn Plant 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Caputo & Guest Mushrooms 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE COLSC Cocalico Service Center 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Phoenixville Service Building 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR HealthSouth Nittany Valley Rehabilitation Hospital 199 FTE
CITY-NEAR Encompass Health Rehabilitation Hospital of NIttany Valley 190 FTE
CITY-NEAR Encompass Health Rehabilitation Hospital Nittany Valley 181 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pleasant Gap Office & Dispatch Office 118 FTE
NAT-TCR North Providence Public Schls 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR RU Catering 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 1818 - Riverhead 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 2334 - Dallas South 5.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Viking SupplyNet & Fabrication Services - Santa Fe Springs 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE 30474 - Capstone Mclane Midwest Danville Il 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oval Construction Management, LLC 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brooklyn Center Community Schools District Office 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.