Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · South Carolina

The Pearl at Five Forks

Simpsonville, SC · ~47 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Pearl at Five Forks runs at 254% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

The Pearl at Five Forks: 9.7 TCR = 254% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Pearl at Five Forks safety composite

The Pearl at Five Forks scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.2

2021→2024

The Pearl at Five Forks injury rate improved

The Pearl at Five Forks's TCR fell 11.2 from 18.6 in 2021 to 7.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 69.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.77× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=18.6 · 2022=69.0 · 2023=3.0 · 2024=7.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Simpsonville, SC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.7 · 254% of ind

  • DART 7.4 DART
  • RANK #66/107
  • PHOTO The Commons on Thorn…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Commons on Thornton (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

The Pearl at Five Forks in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Pearl at Five Forks averages 9.7 TCR (254% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Pearl at Five Forks TCR series: 2021=18.6 · 2022=69 · 2023=3 · 2024=7.4 · BLS 3.8

Where The Pearl at Five Forks falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 33% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #66 safest of 107 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in South Carolina.

The Pearl at Five Forks (47 employees, TCR 9.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Pearl at Five Forks
The Pearl at Five Forks (47 employees, TCR 9.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

The Pearl at Five Forks has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.4 7.4 2 0 0
2023 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2022 69.0 69.0 5 26 0
2021 18.6 18.6 1 6 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · SC · Simpsonville

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 87 employers in Simpsonville, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Commons on Thornton 9.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Citrus 9.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Island Lake 9.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vintage Park of Gardner 9.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE D.R. Horton, Inc. - Columbia 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE GE Healthcare 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fitts & Goodwin, Inc. 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Triangle Construction Co., Inc 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sealed Air Corp, Food And Care Division 1,199 FTE
CITY-NEAR SC_Simpsonville_2 Digital Place_33101080 983 FTE
CITY-NEAR Simpsonville 610 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sunland Logistics Solutions 487 FTE
NAT-TCR Henry Clay Villa, LP 9.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Allina Health Faribault Clinic 9.7 TCR
NAT-TCR METER Group Inc 9.7 TCR
NAT-TCR The Commons on Thornton 9.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Nautilus General Contractors, Inc 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Xanitos EVS at Salem Regional Medical Center 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Enjet Aero Malden LLC 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE The RiverWoods Group 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.