Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Arkansas

The Pillars of the Community

Crossett, AR · ~27 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Pillars of the Community runs at 24% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade A.

The Pillars of the Community: 0.9 TCR = 24% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Pillars of the Community safety composite

The Pillars of the Community scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 99% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

82/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 99% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.6

2018→2024

The Pillars of the Community injury rate improved

The Pillars of the Community's TCR fell 3.6 from 3.6 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 3.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=3.6 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Crossett, AR AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 24% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/51
  • PHOTO Commonwealth Senior …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Commonwealth Senior Living (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arkansas employers → · Look up another →

The Pillars of the Community in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Pillars of the Community averages 0.9 TCR (24% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Pillars of the Community TCR series: 2018=3.6 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where The Pillars of the Community falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 99% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arkansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 51 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Arkansas.

The Pillars of the Community (27 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Pillars of the Community
The Pillars of the Community (27 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

The Pillars of the Community has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.6 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · AR · Crossett

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,393 rated employers in Arkansas with headcount on file · 18 employers in Crossett, AR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Commonwealth Senior Living 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR EMS - Cardigan Ridge Sr Living 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Meridian at Waterways 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Azalea Park 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE 1301-Growout-Live Operations 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Waldron Hatchery 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Grannis/Broken Bow Growout 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dardanelle Growout 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR AR030 Crossett Paper 763 FTE
CITY-NEAR Crossett Health Foundation dba Ashley County Medical Center 324 FTE
CITY-NEAR Crossett Health Foundation 315 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 167 199 FTE
NAT-TCR Davis Frost,Inc 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR S10277 - Macon Hauling 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR SCI, LLC - Nampa 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Joy Global /dba Komatsu Mining 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wholesale Auto Supply Co. Inc. 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Portland-Leasing 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE NW Transplants LLC 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Waller Construction, Inc 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.