Architectural coatings (i.e., paint) manufacturing · Virginia

Davis Frost,Inc

Lynchburg, VA · ~45 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Davis Frost,Inc runs at 27% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Architectural coatings (i.e., paint) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Davis Frost,Inc: 0.9 TCR = 27% of Architectural coatings (i.e., paint) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Davis Frost,Inc safety composite

Davis Frost,Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.6

2016→2024

Davis Frost,Inc injury rate improved

Davis Frost,Inc's TCR fell 2.6 from 2.6 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 3.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.6 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=2.4 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=3.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325510 · Lynchburg, VA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 27% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/5
  • PHOTO US PA Pittsburgh Plant
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~45 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: US PA Pittsburgh Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Davis Frost,Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Davis Frost,Inc averages 0.9 TCR (27% of the Architectural coatings (i.e., paint) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Davis Frost,Inc TCR series: 2016=2.6 · 2017=0 · 2018=2.4 · 2019=0 · 2020=3 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Davis Frost,Inc falls in its industry

530 Architectural coatings (i.e., establishments

Safer than 88% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 5 Architectural coatings (i.e., employers in Virginia.

Davis Frost,Inc (45 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Davis Frost,Inc
Davis Frost,Inc (45 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Davis Frost,Inc has fewer employees than the Architectural coatings (i.e., paint) man median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 3.0 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.4 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 2.6 2.6 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325510 · VA · Lynchburg

530 Architectural coatings (i.e., paint) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 360 employers in Lynchburg, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR US PA Pittsburgh Plant 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Behr Paint Company Roanoke MFG 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR US NC Greensboro Stage Coach Trail Plant 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Behr Paint Company McDonough MFG 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE VA09S-SEL-VIRGINIA SERVICE ROOM 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE GREENSVILLE COUNTY POWER STATION 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE City of Harrisonburg Public Utilities 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Farmville Public Works 45 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lynchburg General Hospital 2,596 FTE
CITY-NEAR BWXT NOG Lynchburg 2,200 FTE
CITY-NEAR BWXT Nuclear Operations Group, Inc. - Lynchburg 2,180 FTE
CITY-NEAR Centra Urgent Care Forest 1,283 FTE
NAT-TCR The Pillars of the Community 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR S10277 - Macon Hauling 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR SCI, LLC - Nampa 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Joy Global /dba Komatsu Mining 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp. 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE SPP Pumps Inc. 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bel Shower Door 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Crossing at Malvern, INC. 45 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.