Construction management, single-family building · Georgia

The Providence Group of GA

Johns Creek, GA · ~100 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Providence Group of GA runs at 33% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Construction management, single-family building workplace, earning a grade A.

The Providence Group of GA: 1.2 TCR = 33% of Construction management, single-family building BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Providence Group of GA safety composite

The Providence Group of GA scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2016→2023

The Providence Group of GA injury rate improved

The Providence Group of GA's TCR fell 1.1 from 1.1 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.2 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.1 · 2017=3.2 · 2018=2.8 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=1.0 · 2021=1.0 · 2022=0.9 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236115 · Johns Creek, GA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 33% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/17
  • PHOTO M Contractors, LLC
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~100 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: M Contractors, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

The Providence Group of GA in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Providence Group of GA averages 1.2 TCR (33% of the Construction management, single-family building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Providence Group of GA TCR series: 2016=1.1 · 2017=3.2 · 2018=2.8 · 2019=0 · 2020=1 · 2021=1 · 2022=0.9 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.8

Where The Providence Group of GA falls in its industry

976 Construction management, singl establishments

Safer than 80% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 17 Construction management, singl employers in Georgia.

The Providence Group of GA (100 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate The Providence Group of GA
The Providence Group of GA (100 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 3.5

The Providence Group of GA has more employees than the Construction management, single-family b median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.9 0.0 1 0 0
2021 1.0 0.0 1 0 0
2020 1.0 0.0 0 1 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.8 2.8 3 0 0
2017 3.2 3.2 3 0 0
2016 1.1 1.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236115 · GA · Johns Creek

976 Construction management, single-family building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 31 employers in Johns Creek, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR M Contractors, LLC 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR D.R. Horton, Inc. - Charleston 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR D.R. Horton, Inc. - San Marcos 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR TRI Pointe Homes CO 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Colquitt Electric Membership Corporation - Moultrie 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE Atlanta Kitchen - Decatur 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southeast Utilities of GA Ince 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE Terrell Silicon Ranch 18145013 100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alcon JCM 1,596 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alcon Johns Creek Manufacturing 1,371 FTE
CITY-NEAR Emory Johns Creek Hospital -6325 EHC 1,363 FTE
CITY-NEAR Macy's Systems and Technology - MAIN OFFICE 1,131 FTE
NAT-TCR Beluga LLC DBA Towneplace Suites 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR BT San Antonio 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 168 - Anaheim Ca Fas 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR United Rotorcraft - PA 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Paul House and Healthcare Center 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Johnson Controls 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dutch-Way Farm Market Schaefferstown 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE WESTPAC LABS Central 100 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.