Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Massachusetts

The Residence at Five Corners

Easton, MA · ~91 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Residence at Five Corners runs at 267% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

The Residence at Five Corners: 10.1 TCR = 267% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Residence at Five Corners safety composite

The Residence at Five Corners scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 58% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.5

2018→2021

The Residence at Five Corners injury rate improved

The Residence at Five Corners's TCR fell 8.5 from 17.7 in 2018 to 9.2 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 17.7 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.23× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=17.7 · 2019=7.7 · 2020=6.0 · 2021=9.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Easton, MA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.1 · 267% of ind

  • DART 2.3 DART
  • RANK #138/210
  • PHOTO 10270
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 26 inj
  • SIZE ~91 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 10270 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

The Residence at Five Corners in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Residence at Five Corners averages 10.1 TCR (267% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Residence at Five Corners TCR series: 2018=17.7 · 2019=7.7 · 2020=6 · 2021=9.2 · BLS 3.8

Where The Residence at Five Corners falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #138 safest of 210 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Massachusetts.

The Residence at Five Corners (91 employees, TCR 10.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Residence at Five Corners
The Residence at Five Corners (91 employees, TCR 10.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

The Residence at Five Corners has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 9.2 2.3 4 0 0
2020 6.0 2.0 3 0 0
2019 7.7 0.8 9 0 0
2018 17.7 3.5 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MA · Easton

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 6 employers in Easton, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 10270 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Bristal at North Woodmere 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dungeness Courte 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale South Park 10.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Weston Nurseries 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wise Construction 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Atlantic Boston Construction 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE CSI NE 91 FTE
CITY-NEAR OCY - Easton 166 FTE
CITY-NEAR Big Y Foods, Inc. Easton 109 FTE
CITY-NEAR Residence at Five Corners 94 FTE
CITY-NEAR JJV office 37 FTE
NAT-TCR Springhurst Health & Rehab 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR MVRBC - Cedar Rapids West 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR state steel supply OM 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Pacific Partners Insulation South (BDI) #899 10.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Detering Company of Houston LP 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE O-I Kalama 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Custom Building Products MIAC 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE 3910 Plant 91 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.