Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Massachusetts

The Residence at Valley Farm

Ashland, MA · ~80 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Residence at Valley Farm runs at 312% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

The Residence at Valley Farm: 11.9 TCR = 312% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Residence at Valley Farm safety composite

The Residence at Valley Farm scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 62% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Residence at Valley Farm: 6.8 → 11.0 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 23.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.15× in 2024

The Residence at Valley Farm's TCR rose 4.2 from 6.8 in 2016 to 11.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 23.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.15× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Ashland, MA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.9 · 312% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #159/210
  • PHOTO Brookdale Denton North
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 31 inj
  • SIZE ~80 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brookdale Denton North (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

The Residence at Valley Farm in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Residence at Valley Farm averages 11.9 TCR (312% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Residence at Valley Farm TCR series: 2016=6.8 · 2017=14.2 · 2018=23.7 · 2023=3.7 · 2024=11 · BLS 3.8

Where The Residence at Valley Farm falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #159 safest of 210 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Massachusetts.

The Residence at Valley Farm (80 employees, TCR 11.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Residence at Valley Farm
The Residence at Valley Farm (80 employees, TCR 11.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

The Residence at Valley Farm has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.0 1.8 6 0 0
2023 3.7 1.9 2 0 0
2018 23.7 1.8 13 0 0
2017 14.2 2.0 7 0 0
2016 6.8 2.3 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MA · Ashland

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 21 employers in Ashland, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Denton North 11.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Highlands 11.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale West Seattle 11.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR BrookdaleTarponSprings 11.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE BEVERLY 5310 ELECTRIC-MA05 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eversource - Hyde Park 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE MIG CORPORATION, INC. 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Diaz Construction Co., Inc. 80 FTE
CITY-NEAR Market Basket #46 321 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kidde-Fenwal, Inc 289 FTE
CITY-NEAR USA-MA-Kidde Fenwal-Ashland Factory 251 FTE
CITY-NEAR Terumo Cardiovascular Group 181 FTE
NAT-TCR Cavallo Point Lodge 11.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Ecdc Bldg 10 - 3039 11.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Evergreen Village Markets LLC- RAYMOND LOCATION 11.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Ralston Soy 11.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Riverside Therapy Group 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Global Machine Works 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Frontiere Natural Meats, LLC 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Richfield District Office 80 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.