Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Michigan

Fostrian Court Assisted Living

Flushing, MI · ~29 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fostrian Court Assisted Living runs at 359% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Fostrian Court Assisted Living: 13.7 TCR = 359% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fostrian Court Assisted Living safety composite

Fostrian Court Assisted Living scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−29.9

2016→2018

Fostrian Court Assisted Living injury rate improved

Fostrian Court Assisted Living's TCR fell 29.9 from 29.9 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 29.9 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=29.9 · 2017=11.0 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Flushing, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.7 · 359% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #75/97
  • PHOTO White Cliffs Senior …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: White Cliffs Senior Living (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Fostrian Court Assisted Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fostrian Court Assisted Living averages 13.7 TCR (359% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fostrian Court Assisted Living TCR series: 2016=29.9 · 2017=11 · 2018=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Fostrian Court Assisted Living falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #75 safest of 97 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Michigan.

Fostrian Court Assisted Living (29 employees, TCR 13.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Fostrian Court Assisted Living
Fostrian Court Assisted Living (29 employees, TCR 13.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Fostrian Court Assisted Living has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 11.0 11.0 2 0 0
2016 29.9 19.9 5 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · MI · Flushing

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 19 employers in Flushing, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR White Cliffs Senior Living 13.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Residences at Thomas Circle 13.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR AVERY PLACE 13.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Watermark at Continental Ranch 13.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Masterpiece Flower Company LLC - Merchandising (IN) 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Great Lakes Packing Co. Hart 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Riveridge Cider 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Covert Generating Company 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ultra-Dex, LLC 545 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fessler & Bowman 541 FTE
CITY-NEAR Heartland Health Care Center - Fostrian 177 FTE
CITY-NEAR Heartland Health Care Center Fostrian 160 FTE
NAT-TCR Kogan Builders, INC. 13.7 TCR
NAT-TCR J-M Northwest, Inc. dba Dick's Towing & Transport 13.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Dutton-Lainson/Hastings Equity Grain Division 13.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society 13.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Progressive Building Systems 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2497 Adie Road Maryland Heights 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wayne NJ (Riverview Dr) Office 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bird Equipment LLC of Ohio 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.