Paperboard (e.g., can/drum stock, container board, corrugating medium, folding carton stock, linerboard, tube) manufacturing · Wisconsin

The Royal Group-Elkhorn

Elkhorn, WI · ~54 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Royal Group-Elkhorn runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Paperboard (e.g., can/drum stock, container board, corrugating medium, folding carton stock, linerboard, tube) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

The Royal Group-Elkhorn: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Paperboard (e.g., can/drum stock, container board, corrugating medium, folding carton stock, linerboard, tube) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Royal Group-Elkhorn safety composite

The Royal Group-Elkhorn scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

83/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

The Royal Group-Elkhorn held a steady TCR band

The Royal Group-Elkhorn's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 0.0 TCR.

2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322130 · Elkhorn, WI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/8
  • PHOTO Evergreen Packaging …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~54 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Evergreen Packaging - Olmsted Falls (0.3 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

The Royal Group-Elkhorn in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Royal Group-Elkhorn averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Paperboard (e.g., can/drum stock, container board, corrugating medium, folding carton stock, linerboard, tube) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Royal Group-Elkhorn TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where The Royal Group-Elkhorn falls in its industry

181 Paperboard (e.g., can/drum sto establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 8 Paperboard (e.g., can/drum sto employers in Wisconsin.

The Royal Group-Elkhorn (54 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 138 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate The Royal Group-Elkhorn
The Royal Group-Elkhorn (54 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 138 employees and a TCR of 2.3

The Royal Group-Elkhorn has fewer employees than the Paperboard (e.g., can/drum stock, contai median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322130 · WI · Elkhorn

181 Paperboard (e.g., can/drum stock, container board, corrugating medium, folding carton stock, linerboard, tube) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 47 employers in Elkhorn, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Evergreen Packaging - Olmsted Falls 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR International Paper Newton Container 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Greif Recycling Moraine 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Evergreen Packaging - Kalamazoo 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dairy Dreams LLC 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE A&M Dittrich 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Michels Utility Services, Inc- WI- Brownsville 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Payne & Dolan, Inc - Racine/Kensoha 54 FTE
CITY-NEAR Elkhorn Area School District 700 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aurora Lakeland Medical Center 505 FTE
CITY-NEAR US Packaging LLC 198 FTE
CITY-NEAR Elkhorn Campus 151 FTE
NAT-TCR Keller Warehouse 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Airborn Inc. Addison 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Integration Appliance Inc. 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR California Department of Transportation Facility 128 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Houston Pauluhn Tx 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Inn at Ironwood 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Crystal Falls Labor, LLC 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Metropolitan Domestic Water Improvement District 54 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.