Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Florida

The Sheridan at Hobe Sound

Hobe Sound, FL · ~74 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
26.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Sheridan at Hobe Sound runs at 685% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

The Sheridan at Hobe Sound: 26.0 TCR = 685% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Sheridan at Hobe Sound safety composite

The Sheridan at Hobe Sound scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 26.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 17.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.6

2020→2023

The Sheridan at Hobe Sound injury rate improved

The Sheridan at Hobe Sound's TCR fell 5.6 from 25.0 in 2020 to 19.4 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 39.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.66× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=25.0 · 2021=20.2 · 2022=39.5 · 2023=19.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Hobe Sound, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 26.0 · 685% of ind

  • DART 17.2 DART
  • RANK #396/396
  • PHOTO 3178_6157
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 26 inj
  • SIZE ~74 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 3178_6157 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

The Sheridan at Hobe Sound in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Sheridan at Hobe Sound averages 26.0 TCR (685% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Sheridan at Hobe Sound TCR series: 2020=25 · 2021=20.2 · 2022=39.5 · 2023=19.4 · BLS 3.8

Where The Sheridan at Hobe Sound falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #396 safest of 396 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Florida.

The Sheridan at Hobe Sound (74 employees, TCR 26.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate The Sheridan at Hobe Sound
The Sheridan at Hobe Sound (74 employees, TCR 26.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

The Sheridan at Hobe Sound has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 19.4 17.2 9 0 0
2022 39.5 39.5 6 8 0
2021 20.2 20.2 4 9 0
2020 25.0 25.0 7 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · FL · Hobe Sound

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 23 employers in Hobe Sound, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 3178_6157 26.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hacienda Crossing LLC 26.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Allouez Sunrise Village 26.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 407- Heritage Court MC 26.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Richard Hagstrom Ferneries 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Perrine Svc Cntr & Str 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Florida Distribution Control Center 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE PC1 Panama City Administration Line Service Center 74 FTE
CITY-NEAR S03058 - Waste Management of Martin County 224 FTE
CITY-NEAR Martin Coast Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare 173 FTE
CITY-NEAR ROOD LANDSCAPE LLC 150 FTE
CITY-NEAR Store 0571 132 FTE
NAT-TCR Allina Health Emergency Medical Services New Ulm 26.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0072 Emeryville 26.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Complete Care Severna Park 26.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Bickford of Bourbonnais 26.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pick Quick Foods Store# 434 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Frank Lloyd Wright Foundation - Taliesin West 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE America's Thrift Store #4 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Theisen's of Davenport 74 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.