Hotels (except casino hotels) with golf courses, tennis courts, and/or other health spa facilities (i.e., resorts) · Connecticut

The Spa at Norwich Inn

Mashantucket, CT · ~284 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Spa at Norwich Inn runs at 134% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Hotels (except casino hotels) with golf courses, tennis courts, and/or other health spa facilities (i.e., resorts) workplace, earning a grade D.

The Spa at Norwich Inn: 4.0 TCR = 134% of Hotels (except casino hotels) with golf courses, tennis courts, and/or other health spa facilities (i.e., resorts) BLS 3.0 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Spa at Norwich Inn safety composite

The Spa at Norwich Inn scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 59% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Spa at Norwich Inn: 2.5 → 5.0 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 5.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.63× in 2018

The Spa at Norwich Inn's TCR rose 2.5 from 2.5 in 2016 to 5.0 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 0.63× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721110 · Mashantucket, CT ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.0 · 134% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #25/80
  • PHOTO 51853 HOME2 SUITES B…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~284 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 51853 HOME2 SUITES BY HILTON HELENA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

The Spa at Norwich Inn in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Spa at Norwich Inn averages 4.0 TCR (134% of the Hotels (except casino hotels) with golf courses, tennis courts, and/or other health spa facilities (i.e., resorts) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Spa at Norwich Inn TCR series: 2016=2.5 · 2017=4.5 · 2018=5 · BLS 3.0

Where The Spa at Norwich Inn falls in its industry

9,342 Hotels (except casino hotels) establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #25 safest of 80 Hotels (except casino hotels) employers in Connecticut.

The Spa at Norwich Inn (284 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate The Spa at Norwich Inn
The Spa at Norwich Inn (284 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8

The Spa at Norwich Inn has more employees than the Hotels (except casino hotels) with golf median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 5.0 2.5 8 0 0
2017 4.5 3.2 6 1 0
2016 2.5 0.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721110 · CT · Mashantucket

9,342 Hotels (except casino hotels) with golf courses, tennis courts, and/or other health spa facilities (i.e., resorts) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 6 employers in Mashantucket, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 51853 HOME2 SUITES BY HILTON HELENA 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Commander Hotel LLC 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oklahoma City Residence Inn 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hyatt Place Novi 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE WM 5777 284 FTE
STATE-SIZE DPW 285 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sylvan R Shemitz Designs LLC 285 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sysco Connecticut, LLC 285 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mashantucket Pequot Gaming Enterprise 4,404 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Nation 534 FTE
CITY-NEAR MPTN Gov't 447 FTE
CITY-NEAR SODEXO AT FOXWOODS RESORT & CASINO EDR 169 FTE
NAT-TCR BMSI 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR DSI 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Eastland Suites-Urbana, LLC 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 2336 Shoppers-Fair City (Sv 052015) 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE APG Headquarters 284 FTE
NAT-SIZE SandRidge Operating - Corporate Office 284 FTE
NAT-SIZE Columbus Regional Healthcar System 284 FTE
NAT-SIZE RCHC AK Anchorage State Funded (PPC) 284 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.