Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Pennsylvania

The Terrace at Chestnut Hill

Philadelphia, PA · ~85 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Terrace at Chestnut Hill runs at 186% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

The Terrace at Chestnut Hill: 7.0 TCR = 186% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Terrace at Chestnut Hill safety composite

The Terrace at Chestnut Hill scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 67% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.3

2017→2024

The Terrace at Chestnut Hill injury rate improved

The Terrace at Chestnut Hill's TCR fell 2.3 from 5.7 in 2017 to 3.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 11.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.24× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.7 · 2020=11.6 · 2023=7.5 · 2024=3.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Philadelphia, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 7.0 · 186% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #127/257
  • PHOTO Duncaster
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~85 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Duncaster (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

The Terrace at Chestnut Hill in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Terrace at Chestnut Hill averages 7.0 TCR (186% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Terrace at Chestnut Hill TCR series: 2017=5.7 · 2020=11.6 · 2023=7.5 · 2024=3.4 · BLS 3.8

Where The Terrace at Chestnut Hill falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #127 safest of 257 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Pennsylvania.

The Terrace at Chestnut Hill (85 employees, TCR 7.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate The Terrace at Chestnut Hill
The Terrace at Chestnut Hill (85 employees, TCR 7.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

The Terrace at Chestnut Hill has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.4 1.7 2 0 0
2023 7.5 3.0 5 0 0
2020 11.6 11.6 2 0 0
2017 5.7 4.3 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · PA · Philadelphia

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 1,431 employers in Philadelphia, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Duncaster 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR American House - West Knoxville 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Milestone Senior Living-Tomahawk 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Peabody Home 7.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bear Mountain Orchards, Inc. 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE SFC System Facility Center 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE UTY - MidAtlantic - Harrisburg,PA 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Buncher Company 85 FTE
CITY-NEAR FIVE BELOW INC 19,600 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hospital of University of Pennsylvania 13,423 FTE
CITY-NEAR Children's Hospital of Philadelphia - Main Hospital 9,638 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia - Main Campus 9,129 FTE
NAT-TCR 4711 Bellevue Wa 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR McKay's Market Reedsport #9 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 2361 Fre50 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Amarillo Tx - 833 7.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE OMNI Components Corp 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dc 6000 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6202 Orange Ct 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marc Glassman Inc 52NC 85 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2020, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.