Continuing care retirement communities · Florida

The Terraces at Bonita Springs

Bonita Springs, FL · ~187 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Terraces at Bonita Springs runs at 134% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade D.

The Terraces at Bonita Springs: 5.1 TCR = 134% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Terraces at Bonita Springs safety composite

The Terraces at Bonita Springs scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 67% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.1

2017→2023

The Terraces at Bonita Springs injury rate improved

The Terraces at Bonita Springs's TCR fell 3.1 from 6.2 in 2017 to 3.2 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 6.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.53× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=6.2 · 2018=5.2 · 2019=6.9 · 2020=5.9 · 2021=5.7 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=3.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Bonita Springs, FL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.1 · 134% of ind

  • DART 2.7 DART
  • RANK #74/283
  • PHOTO Arden Courts of Monr…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 57 inj
  • SIZE ~187 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Arden Courts of Monroeville (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

The Terraces at Bonita Springs in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Terraces at Bonita Springs averages 5.1 TCR (134% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Terraces at Bonita Springs TCR series: 2017=6.2 · 2018=5.2 · 2019=6.9 · 2020=5.9 · 2021=5.7 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=3.2 · BLS 3.8

Where The Terraces at Bonita Springs falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #74 safest of 283 Continuing care retirement com employers in Florida.

The Terraces at Bonita Springs (187 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate The Terraces at Bonita Springs
The Terraces at Bonita Springs (187 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

The Terraces at Bonita Springs has more employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.2 2.7 7 0 0
2022 2.6 1.8 6 0 0
2021 5.7 5.0 8 0 0
2020 5.9 4.2 7 0 0
2019 6.9 3.8 9 0 0
2018 5.2 3.3 8 0 0
2017 6.2 2.6 12 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · FL · Bonita Springs

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 78 employers in Bonita Springs, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Arden Courts of Monroeville 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Signe Burckhardt Manor 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Willowbend 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR HELENA PLACE 5.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE CSC Steel Jacksonville 187 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2636-FLORIDA.MIAMI 187 FTE
STATE-SIZE Aerojet Rocketdyne Coleman Aerospace 187 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2807-1073 187 FTE
CITY-NEAR Coconut Point (HR) 413 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hyatt Regency Coconut Point Resort and Spa 383 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hyatt Regency Coconut Point Resort & Spa 368 FTE
CITY-NEAR DeRomo's Gourmet Market & Restaurant 221 FTE
NAT-TCR PHA - Mt. Airy Homes & Hi-Rise, Maintenance, Shop 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Wis-Pak of Norfolk 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Devonshire Estates 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR St. Albans #127 5.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (CQE-6414) 187 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marion Reservation Center 187 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hyatt Regency Portland 187 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mayo Clinic Health System-Lake City 187 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.