Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors · Ohio

The Thomas J. Dyer Company

Cincinnati, OH · ~177 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Thomas J. Dyer Company runs at 56% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors workplace, earning a grade B.

The Thomas J. Dyer Company: 1.6 TCR = 56% of Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Thomas J. Dyer Company safety composite

The Thomas J. Dyer Company scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.3

2016→2024

The Thomas J. Dyer Company injury rate improved

The Thomas J. Dyer Company's TCR fell 1.3 from 2.3 in 2016 to 1.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 3.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.62× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.3 · 2018=1.8 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=3.2 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=1.3 · 2024=1.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Cincinnati, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.6 · 56% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #67/300
  • PHOTO Kings Aire, Inc
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~177 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Kings Aire, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

The Thomas J. Dyer Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Thomas J. Dyer Company averages 1.6 TCR (56% of the Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Thomas J. Dyer Company TCR series: 2016=2.3 · 2018=1.8 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=3.2 · 2021=0 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=1.3 · 2024=1 · BLS 2.8

Where The Thomas J. Dyer Company falls in its industry

5,793 Heating, ventilation and air-c establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #67 safest of 300 Heating, ventilation and air-c employers in Ohio.

The Thomas J. Dyer Company (177 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate The Thomas J. Dyer Company
The Thomas J. Dyer Company (177 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

The Thomas J. Dyer Company has more employees than the Heating, ventilation and air-conditionin median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.0 1.0 2 0 0
2023 1.3 0.0 2 0 0
2022 1.2 0.0 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 3.2 2.1 6 0 0
2019 1.8 0.0 4 0 0
2018 1.8 1.8 4 0 0
2016 2.3 0.9 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · OH · Cincinnati

5,793 Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 1,513 employers in Cincinnati, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Kings Aire, Inc 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Apex Mechanical Systems, Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 0F24 - FT MYERS FIRE 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bullseye Leak Detection, Inc. 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Municipal Energy Services Agency / AMP 177 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pratt (Lewisburg Corrugating), LLC 177 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pressboard Paper Technologies LLC. 177 FTE
STATE-SIZE Teijin Automotive Technologies Conneaut 177 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center 17,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Operations 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain : Evendale, OH 7,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain Evendale OH 6,400 FTE
NAT-TCR Industrial Gas Engineering Co., Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Kauffman Bus Service Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Wise Electric Cooperative - Decatur 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Corn Lp 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Enterprise UTM 177 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shady Lane, Inc. 177 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4Front Engineered Solutions- Muskego 177 FTE
NAT-SIZE ID Technology 177 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.