Continuing care retirement communities · Pennsylvania

The Village at Gettysburg

Gettysburg, PA · ~131 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Village at Gettysburg runs at 153% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade D.

The Village at Gettysburg: 5.8 TCR = 153% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Village at Gettysburg safety composite

The Village at Gettysburg scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 61% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.5

2016→2024

The Village at Gettysburg injury rate improved

The Village at Gettysburg's TCR fell 3.5 from 8.4 in 2016 to 4.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 13.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.62× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.4 · 2017=8.5 · 2018=13.6 · 2019=5.4 · 2020=3.7 · 2021=4.2 · 2022=1.5 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=4.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Gettysburg, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.8 · 153% of ind

  • DART 3.6 DART
  • RANK #90/257
  • PHOTO Windsor Heights
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 51 inj
  • SIZE ~131 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Windsor Heights (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

The Village at Gettysburg in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Village at Gettysburg averages 5.8 TCR (153% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Village at Gettysburg TCR series: 2016=8.4 · 2017=8.5 · 2018=13.6 · 2019=5.4 · 2020=3.7 · 2021=4.2 · 2022=1.5 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=4.8 · BLS 3.8

Where The Village at Gettysburg falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #90 safest of 257 Continuing care retirement com employers in Pennsylvania.

The Village at Gettysburg (131 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate The Village at Gettysburg
The Village at Gettysburg (131 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

The Village at Gettysburg has more employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.8 3.6 4 0 0
2023 2.4 2.4 2 0 0
2022 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2021 4.2 4.2 3 0 0
2020 3.7 3.7 1 2 0
2019 5.4 4.3 5 0 0
2018 13.6 10.0 15 0 0
2017 8.5 8.5 10 0 0
2016 8.4 7.5 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · PA · Gettysburg

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 45 employers in Gettysburg, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Windsor Heights 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Clermont Park 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR OAK HAMMOCK AT THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA, INC. 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR NHC Place Farragut Memory Care 5.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bazella Group 131 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harris Masonry, Inc 131 FTE
STATE-SIZE D24 Pittsburgh 131 FTE
STATE-SIZE Zentis NA - Philadelphia 131 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gettysburg Hospital 839 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pella Corporation 479 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hillandale Gettysburg, LP 416 FTE
CITY-NEAR Diebold Nixdorf Gettysburg PA 414 FTE
NAT-TCR WLCH-Wesley Long Community Hospital 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR HCA Florida St. Lucie Hospital 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Barro's Pizza, 7th St 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookdale Colonial Heights 5.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hilton University of Florida Conference Center 131 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wilmington 131 FTE
NAT-SIZE Franciscan Health Care Center 131 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hawkeye Care Centers of Dubuque LLC 131 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.