Continuing care retirement communities · Florida

Oak Hammock at the University of Florida, Inc.

Gainesville, FL · ~322 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Oak Hammock at the University of Florida, Inc. runs at 153% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade D.

Oak Hammock at the University of Florida, Inc.: 5.8 TCR = 153% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Oak Hammock at the University of Florida, Inc. safety composite

Oak Hammock at the University of Florida, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 65% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Oak Hammock at the University of Florida, Inc.: 5.8 → 711.7 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 711.7 TCR · DART/TCR 40.76× in 2024

Oak Hammock at the University of Florida, Inc.'s TCR rose 705.9 from 5.8 in 2023 to 711.7 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 40.76× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Gainesville, FL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.8 · 153% of ind

  • DART 237.3 DART
  • RANK #97/283
  • PHOTO NHC Place Farragut M…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~322 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NHC Place Farragut Memory Care (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Oak Hammock at the University of Florida, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Oak Hammock at the University of Florida, Inc. averages 5.8 TCR (153% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Oak Hammock at the University of Florida, Inc. TCR series: 2023=5.8 · 2024=711.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Oak Hammock at the University of Florida, Inc. falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #97 safest of 283 Continuing care retirement com employers in Florida.

Oak Hammock at the University of Florida, Inc. (322 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Oak Hammock at the University of Florida, Inc.
Oak Hammock at the University of Florida, Inc. (322 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Oak Hammock at the University of Florida, Inc. has more employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 711.7 237.3 3 0 0
2023 5.8 1.9 15 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · FL · Gainesville

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 278 employers in Gainesville, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NHC Place Farragut Memory Care 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR AEC-ALAMANCE REGIONAL EXTENDED CAR 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Village at Gettysburg 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Windsor Heights 5.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Statewide Harvesting & Hauling, LLC 322 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 1171 322 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4M - Jacksonville 322 FTE
STATE-SIZE AdventHealth Connerton 322 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shands UF Hospital 9,178 FTE
CITY-NEAR Terrace Health & Rehabilitation Center 9,005 FTE
CITY-NEAR HCA Florida North Florida Hospital 2,414 FTE
CITY-NEAR NORTH FLORIDA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 1,770 FTE
NAT-TCR 166 Gre1000 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Parents Foundation for Transitional Living, Inc 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Bug Busters Pest Control Services, Inc. 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR RAE Corporation 5.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Autoneum North America Inc 322 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clorox Services 322 FTE
NAT-SIZE Waunakee 322 FTE
NAT-SIZE Peerless Products Inc 322 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.