Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Indiana

The Villages at Oak Ridge

Washington, IN · ~82 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Villages at Oak Ridge runs at 177% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

The Villages at Oak Ridge: 6.7 TCR = 177% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Villages at Oak Ridge safety composite

The Villages at Oak Ridge scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−12.5

2016→2024

The Villages at Oak Ridge injury rate improved

The Villages at Oak Ridge's TCR fell 12.5 from 20.3 in 2016 to 7.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 52.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.97× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=20.3 · 2017=7.2 · 2018=3.5 · 2019=2.9 · 2020=52.8 · 2021=2.9 · 2022=3.9 · 2023=5.2 · 2024=7.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Washington, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.7 · 177% of ind

  • DART 6.5 DART
  • RANK #71/133
  • PHOTO Paramount Senior Liv…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 35 inj
  • SIZE ~82 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Paramount Senior Living at Manassas (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

The Villages at Oak Ridge in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Villages at Oak Ridge averages 6.7 TCR (177% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Villages at Oak Ridge TCR series: 2016=20.3 · 2017=7.2 · 2018=3.5 · 2019=2.9 · 2020=52.8 · 2021=2.9 · 2022=3.9 · 2023=5.2 · 2024=7.8 · BLS 3.8

Where The Villages at Oak Ridge falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 54% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #71 safest of 133 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Indiana.

The Villages at Oak Ridge (82 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Villages at Oak Ridge
The Villages at Oak Ridge (82 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

The Villages at Oak Ridge has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.8 6.5 6 0 0
2023 5.2 3.9 4 0 0
2022 3.9 3.9 1 2 0
2021 2.9 2.9 2 0 0
2020 52.8 52.8 2 36 0
2019 2.9 2.9 2 0 0
2018 3.5 3.5 2 0 0
2017 7.2 5.4 4 0 0
2016 20.3 11.8 12 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · IN · Washington

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 42 employers in Washington, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Paramount Senior Living at Manassas 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 63140 SUNRISE OF HUNTCLIFF SUMMIT I 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oaks at Snellville 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cadence at Chandler 6.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sunny Side Farms 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE TK Elevator Indianapolis 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE ICC Floors 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE Allliance Sheets LLC 82 FTE
CITY-NEAR Washington Plant 735 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1162 326 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1162 315 FTE
CITY-NEAR WASH-WB 224 FTE
NAT-TCR Timber Point Healthcare Center 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Pathways PACE-SWIA 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Evergreen Senior Care and Rehab 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Legend at Fort Worth 6.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Crown Lift Trucks Orlando 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE ILN Air Transport Service Group (ATSG) 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aperion Care Dolton 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Crown Lift Trucks Kansas City 82 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.