Nursing homes · Michigan

Evergreen Senior Care and Rehab

Springfield, MI · ~122 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
6.7
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Evergreen Senior Care and Rehab runs at 103% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Nursing homes workplace, earning a grade C.

Evergreen Senior Care and Rehab: 6.7 TCR = 103% of Nursing homes BLS 6.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Evergreen Senior Care and Rehab safety composite

Evergreen Senior Care and Rehab scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
B 1.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.8

2016→2024

Evergreen Senior Care and Rehab injury rate improved

Evergreen Senior Care and Rehab's TCR fell 1.8 from 2.9 in 2016 to 1.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 16.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.17× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.9 · 2018=1.9 · 2019=6.6 · 2020=16.9 · 2021=12.7 · 2022=4.8 · 2023=6.8 · 2024=1.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Springfield, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 6.7 · 103% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #197/471
  • PHOTO Rolling Green Village
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 40 inj
  • SIZE ~122 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Rolling Green Village (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Evergreen Senior Care and Rehab in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Evergreen Senior Care and Rehab averages 6.7 TCR (103% of the Nursing homes BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Evergreen Senior Care and Rehab TCR series: 2016=2.9 · 2018=1.9 · 2019=6.6 · 2020=16.9 · 2021=12.7 · 2022=4.8 · 2023=6.8 · 2024=1.1 · BLS 6.5

Where Evergreen Senior Care and Rehab falls in its industry

15,252 Nursing homes establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #197 safest of 471 Nursing homes employers in Michigan.

Evergreen Senior Care and Rehab (122 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Evergreen Senior Care and Rehab
Evergreen Senior Care and Rehab (122 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Evergreen Senior Care and Rehab has more employees than the Nursing homes median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2023 6.8 1.1 6 0 0
2022 4.8 4.8 4 0 0
2021 12.7 8.8 9 1 0
2020 16.9 14.4 5 9 0
2019 6.6 6.6 6 0 0
2018 1.9 1.6 6 0 0
2016 2.9 2.9 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · MI · Springfield

15,252 Nursing homes employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 5 employers in Springfield, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Rolling Green Village 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR TIMBER POINT HEALTHCARE CENTER 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR AVANTE AT LAKE WORTH 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lake Charles Care Center, LLC 6.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wolgast Corporation 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE Action Traffic Maintenance Inc. 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE JK Masonry Inc 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schad Boiler Setting Company 122 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sherriff-Goslin Company 159 FTE
CITY-NEAR S03902 - Battle Creek Hauling 53 FTE
CITY-NEAR Overhead Door Company of Battle Creek 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR Foodliner-Battle Creek 24 FTE
NAT-TCR Pathways PACE-SWIA 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Salsbery Brothers Landscaping, Inc. 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR The Villages at Oak Ridge 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Timber Point Healthcare Center 6.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Giant Eagle #6388 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pinkard Construction Co. 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE 5140 Fresenius Medical Care 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bryan Transport - South Central - Terminal 122 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.