Continuing care retirement communities · South Carolina

The Waterford at Dillon Pointe

Spartanburg, SC · ~35 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Waterford at Dillon Pointe runs at 311% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade F.

The Waterford at Dillon Pointe: 11.8 TCR = 311% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Waterford at Dillon Pointe safety composite

The Waterford at Dillon Pointe scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

The Waterford at Dillon Pointe held a steady TCR band

The Waterford at Dillon Pointe's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 46.8 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=8.2 · 2018=46.8 · 2019=4.0 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Spartanburg, SC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.8 · 311% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #64/76
  • PHOTO Silver Springs
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Silver Springs (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

The Waterford at Dillon Pointe in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Waterford at Dillon Pointe averages 11.8 TCR (311% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Waterford at Dillon Pointe TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=8.2 · 2018=46.8 · 2019=4 · 2020=0 · BLS 3.8

Where The Waterford at Dillon Pointe falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #64 safest of 76 Continuing care retirement com employers in South Carolina.

The Waterford at Dillon Pointe (35 employees, TCR 11.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate The Waterford at Dillon Pointe
The Waterford at Dillon Pointe (35 employees, TCR 11.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

The Waterford at Dillon Pointe has fewer employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 4.0 0.0 1 0 0
2018 46.8 0.0 0 14 0
2017 8.2 5.4 3 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · SC · Spartanburg

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 294 employers in Spartanburg, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Silver Springs 11.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR River View Assisted Living 11.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Inspired Living at Lakewood Ranch 11.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Morning Pointe of Danville 11.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Conway Service Center and Warehouse 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE FLORENCE DISTRICT OFFICE 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Power Delivery Operations (Charleston) 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Darlington County Water & Sewer Authority 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR SPARTANBURG FOOD 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR Spartanburg Medical Center 5,386 FTE
CITY-NEAR Spartanburg County 1,633 FTE
CITY-NEAR Spartanburg County Government 1,561 FTE
NAT-TCR Timber Ridge Health Care 11.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Yardley Commons 11.8 TCR
NAT-TCR TraPac, LLC-Jacksonville 11.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Consulate Health Care of St. Petersburg 11.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Robinson Electric 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE B & L Mechanical, Inc. 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE MITO Corporation 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Solar Turbines Incorporated DEPI Office 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.