Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Wisconsin

The Waterford at Hartford

Hartford, WI · ~42 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Waterford at Hartford runs at 238% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

The Waterford at Hartford: 9.1 TCR = 238% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Waterford at Hartford safety composite

The Waterford at Hartford scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 9.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Waterford at Hartford: 12.3 → 13.4 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 32.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.37× in 2024

The Waterford at Hartford's TCR rose 1.1 from 12.3 in 2016 to 13.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 32.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.37× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Hartford, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.1 · 238% of ind

  • DART 3.4 DART
  • RANK #208/273
  • PHOTO Inspired Living Sun …
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Inspired Living Sun City (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

The Waterford at Hartford in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Waterford at Hartford averages 9.1 TCR (238% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Waterford at Hartford TCR series: 2016=12.3 · 2017=0 · 2018=32.8 · 2019=6.6 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=13.1 · 2023=3.3 · 2024=13.4 · BLS 3.8

Where The Waterford at Hartford falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #208 safest of 273 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Wisconsin.

The Waterford at Hartford (42 employees, TCR 9.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Waterford at Hartford
The Waterford at Hartford (42 employees, TCR 9.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

The Waterford at Hartford has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 13.4 3.4 4 0 0
2023 3.3 0.0 1 0 0
2022 13.1 3.3 4 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 6.6 6.6 2 0 0
2018 32.8 32.8 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 12.3 3.1 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · WI · Hartford

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 48 employers in Hartford, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Inspired Living Sun City 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale New Braunfels 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Albertville 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ridgeview Assisted Living 9.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Port Washington Generating Station 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sterling Water, Inc 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Roberts Irrigation Co 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bielinski Homes 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR HARTFORD WI 743 FTE
CITY-NEAR SIGNICAST LLC 738 FTE
CITY-NEAR Signicast - Hartford Manufacturing Complex 736 FTE
CITY-NEAR Broan-NuTone LLC 723 FTE
NAT-TCR Carolina'S Medical Center 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Roto Frank of America, Inc. 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR The Medical Center of Aurora 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR North Park Post-Acute 9.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Universal Metro Inc 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE DiMare Fresh, Inc. Scranton 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Liberty Arena 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mill Creek Lumber Kansas- Wichita 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.