Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Ohio

The Waterford at Mansfield

Mansfield, OH · ~56 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Waterford at Mansfield runs at 42% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade A.

The Waterford at Mansfield: 1.6 TCR = 42% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Waterford at Mansfield safety composite

The Waterford at Mansfield scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

The Waterford at Mansfield held a steady TCR band

The Waterford at Mansfield's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 6.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2020=3.5 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.1 · 2023=6.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Mansfield, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 42% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #14/243
  • PHOTO Gardens of Trent
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~56 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Gardens of Trent (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

The Waterford at Mansfield in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Waterford at Mansfield averages 1.6 TCR (42% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Waterford at Mansfield TCR series: 2016=0 · 2020=3.5 · 2021=0 · 2022=0.1 · 2023=6 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where The Waterford at Mansfield falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 243 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Ohio.

The Waterford at Mansfield (56 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Waterford at Mansfield
The Waterford at Mansfield (56 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

The Waterford at Mansfield has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 6.0 2.0 3 0 0
2022 0.1 0.1 3 3 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 3.5 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · OH · Mansfield

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 164 employers in Mansfield, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Gardens of Trent 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Senior Lifestyle 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hawthorne Ridge 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Elder Care Alliance 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Rindler Poultry LLC 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Canton General Service Center 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE 919-NiSource-Chillicothe OH-Three Rivers Op 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE 977-NiSource-Findlay OH-Lake Erie Op Ctr 56 FTE
CITY-NEAR MedCentral Hospital 2,732 FTE
CITY-NEAR Newman Technology, Inc 794 FTE
CITY-NEAR Avita Health System Ontario Location 485 FTE
CITY-NEAR Broshco Fabricated Products 468 FTE
NAT-TCR Ardent Mills Commerce City 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Blue Origin Texas 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR D83 Seattle 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 57218 Puerto Rico 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mainstreet Village 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Walnut Valley Water District 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE LaurelHurst and LaurelWoods 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tram-AK 56 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.